-
This site is sponsored by Lang & Potter.
Legal threats to the Trust ISC.
- Thread starter sharkbait
- Start date
esmer":12dgjufe said:
He may not have been elected ...yet! but to say Chris represents nobody is pedantic bullsh*t. He certainly represents me, and if you manage to get your head out from inside the cavity at your rear, you'll notice from most of the replies on this thread that a significant number of others consider him to be representing them too. In fact, people are joining the Trust purely in response to the work Chris is doing.
- Sep 30, 2003
- 8,528
- 7,791
- 44
John_Vaughan":1kc5yqee said:
Good spot John.
As far as I can see the only person actually threatened with legal action is BG. From Chris' post BG has made no such 'threat'.
The chest thumping on here is unbelievable from people that don't seem to have actually read the details just the thread title.
[
Chris[/quote]
Can you expand a bit, what are the specific issues causing the problem? Is he concerned you are jepordising the process?[/quote]
Surely those are questions you should be raising with Guilfoyle and Ridsdale next time you see them?[/quote]
That's right, don't let the facts get in the way of a good witch-hunt. We've had four pages of bile without a clue what it is about. If this whole thing goes mammaries up and we end up without a club you guys are going to have to take your share of the responsibility.
I would also remind Chris he represents nobody, he and his fellow committee members are un-elected and he should make that clear when he deals with the Football League and the media etc.[/quote]
I would say Chris represents about 90% of the argyle fans appauled at this complete farce of a takeover and what it will mean to our club financially and morally. Ok if the last 4 pages were not to your like liking how about 8 months of broken promises and deceit. FACT brenda lied about knowing the identity of the PB, FACT ginger rodent has only paid 300k exclusivity payment, FACT ginger rodent is refusing to reveal the identities of his financial backers (which in my opinon he clearly doesnt have anyway) FACT him and riddler are deliberately prolonging this process and constantly changing deadlines. I could go on and on and on. Why dont you just go and crawl back under the rock you came from you annoying little attention seeker. Why dont you and mariner go and form your own own forum in a shrine to the mighty heaney, brenda and riddler. If you are that shallow that all you care about is being able to watch sub standard L2 football go and support Torquay. I would choose to watch an "AFC Argyle" in the south western league run by a trust with decent fans with morals over your leeds mafia property development team
In the words of Kevin Keagan " I will love it" if these snakes get their hands on our club and you see what happens afters its been raped. I want you and mariner to come on here and personally apologise to every one of us that tried to warn people
PS I joined the trust today
PPS a message to brenda's Claims Direct lawyers if you are reading this: (in my opinion) I cannot wait to see this being his last ever job in football because after what he is trying to do to our club he's not going to be touched by a piece of $hit on a stick, let alone another club
LEEDS MAFIA OUT NOW
Chris[/quote]
Can you expand a bit, what are the specific issues causing the problem? Is he concerned you are jepordising the process?[/quote]
Surely those are questions you should be raising with Guilfoyle and Ridsdale next time you see them?[/quote]
That's right, don't let the facts get in the way of a good witch-hunt. We've had four pages of bile without a clue what it is about. If this whole thing goes mammaries up and we end up without a club you guys are going to have to take your share of the responsibility.
I would also remind Chris he represents nobody, he and his fellow committee members are un-elected and he should make that clear when he deals with the Football League and the media etc.[/quote]
I would say Chris represents about 90% of the argyle fans appauled at this complete farce of a takeover and what it will mean to our club financially and morally. Ok if the last 4 pages were not to your like liking how about 8 months of broken promises and deceit. FACT brenda lied about knowing the identity of the PB, FACT ginger rodent has only paid 300k exclusivity payment, FACT ginger rodent is refusing to reveal the identities of his financial backers (which in my opinon he clearly doesnt have anyway) FACT him and riddler are deliberately prolonging this process and constantly changing deadlines. I could go on and on and on. Why dont you just go and crawl back under the rock you came from you annoying little attention seeker. Why dont you and mariner go and form your own own forum in a shrine to the mighty heaney, brenda and riddler. If you are that shallow that all you care about is being able to watch sub standard L2 football go and support Torquay. I would choose to watch an "AFC Argyle" in the south western league run by a trust with decent fans with morals over your leeds mafia property development team
In the words of Kevin Keagan " I will love it" if these snakes get their hands on our club and you see what happens afters its been raped. I want you and mariner to come on here and personally apologise to every one of us that tried to warn people
PS I joined the trust today
PPS a message to brenda's Claims Direct lawyers if you are reading this: (in my opinion) I cannot wait to see this being his last ever job in football because after what he is trying to do to our club he's not going to be touched by a piece of $hit on a stick, let alone another club
LEEDS MAFIA OUT NOW
E
ellipses
Guest
As a rescent trust joiner, I just want to add one more to the list of people who consider Chris is representing them. If I didnt think he was, I wouldn't have joined.
A
Anonymous
Guest
esmer":1hatu778 said:
You're having a larf! Keep burying your head in the sand esmer. There are over 1100 members, and many more supporters who are not members. Do you hear any of them complaining? No
He is not seeking to destroy the club, he is playing a role in trying to safeguard the future of the club in a form that most of us value, but which you have no interest in and will happily see compromised or even destroyed.
Are you on double time for a Saturday shift?
esmer":1g6qq3i1 said:Not happy? I'm peed off.FordGreen":1g6qq3i1 said:Hissy fit alert! Hissy fit alert! Esmer's not happy again.
Good. The sooner you and your cronies are out of here the better. When you next decide to criticise the rescue plan for a lack of transparency, you might want to consider the transparency of the administration/preferred bidder process. You might also note that all of the people involved in the rescue plan have been named and many of their advocates post on here under their real names.
Since you joined this forum the morning after Ridsdale first appeared, I wonder whether you'll be off if/when the deal collapses? Also, have you agreed to meet IJN yet?
Daz":yfi8kdm7 said:
BG represents a large, wealthy, financial organisation, probably with lawyers on expensive retainers available at his beck and call and - because of the nature of his job - is probably very au fait with most of the legal aspects of the financial world.
Chris is a volunteer, representing a (relatively) poorly-funded organisation comprising no professional staff but consists solely of other volunteers.
I'd say BG's "threat" of legal action is much more sinister than the perceived "threat" of legal action from a voluntary body. BG has not been "threatened". He has been informed that the Trust may have to seek legal advice, probably to have a professional check over some of the comments made to Chris. To my mind a total understandable position to take if you're not "in the business".
If a solicitor turned up at your house of place of business stating that such-and-such legal postion was in force and you had to comply, would you just accept it without taking legal advice of your own?
