It's about playing to your strengths. If a team is unlikely to win a header they have to work other options. Short corners, hard low corners etc. Our success rate from them isn't good.Nobody hits corners in hard and low. Just doesn't work.
It's about playing to your strengths. If a team is unlikely to win a header they have to work other options. Short corners, hard low corners etc. Our success rate from them isn't good.Nobody hits corners in hard and low. Just doesn't work.
So why does nobody do hard low corners though?It's about playing to your strengths. If a team is unlikely to win a header they have to work other options. Short corners, hard low corners etc
Jon Nolan being mentioned on twitter. A good player although we are pretty well stacked in CM.
Jon Nolan being mentioned on twitter. A good player although we are pretty well stacked in CM.
A well directed long ball directed towards the opposition corner flag for someone like Garrick or Hardie to run for, would be better than 'hoofing it aimlessly' in my opinionPhysical presence outside the box too. I think we just disagree on the definition of a target man. I keep saying I don't advocate hoofing it up aimlessly although sometimes there is no choice.
We would have nothing to lose by trying this tactic every now and again. We aren't having much sucess floating the ball in. A low hard cross would be difficult to defend.So why does nobody do hard low corners though?
It's not such an easy thing to do. Have you tried ? How many strikers shoot over the bar. Its a bit of a skill to keep it low. Usually its achieved via a short corner, but that gives defending teams a chance to close you down.So why does nobody do hard low corners though?
I think it would be easier to defend which is why nobody does it.We would have nothing to lose by trying this tactic every now and again. We aren't having much sucess floating the ball in. A low hard cross would be difficult to defend.
No, not easier.I think it would be easier to defend which is why nobody does it.
Exactly. I think the Hertha chap is a little confused.Nothing says lack of rumours on transfer deadline day than a discussion on corner routines!
FWIW I can’t imagine a low driven corner would beat the first man very often….
So let's get back to transfers again then eh?This thread has drifted from 'transfers' to the apparent ineffectiveness of corners as an opportunity to score. [snip]
Left in 2016.Latterly, I have been very critical of Argyle ?
Why ?
Playing with little or no shape - can Brunt play with Randell play with Houghton - as an example ?
The defence have been at sixes and sevens - I believe, we are a patch of the team from several weeks ago ?
Is rotation working ?
Has it spoilt the essence of the team ?
Let you observers pick the bones !!