Bristol Rich":2fk04tnf said:Nobby":2fk04tnf said:Frazer Lloyd-Davies":2fk04tnf said:The Doctor":2fk04tnf said:Frazer Lloyd-Davies":2fk04tnf said:We have an aging fan base, a number of which may rely on the Herald for their Argyle news. I know it seems mad to some but not everyone uses the Internet like us on here. Strange move that won't bring Adams and the fans any closer together.
It's not intended to do that though is it? It's surely intended to make Plymouth Live and The Herald re-think their policy on the kinds of Argyle-related content they produce. But whether it will do that is anyone's guess. It is at least AS likely that they will maintain their current stance because pretty obviously that is the general approach across the whole Plymouth Live website these days.
It's not the intention - no. However, it is a consequence. Just browsing through social media and it's not a roundly popular decision, whatever you think of Plymouth Live.
I think this is a case of Derek Adams being petulant personally and it's creating needless drama and conflict when we're not certain of our League One status next season.
So when we’re on a good run of form and everyone’s feeling more positive, what benefit does it do for the Herald to post a fairly critical article of the manager from a player who left two years ago? I’d describe that as pretty needless myself.
It was correct to question Adams after throwing away the lead twice on Saturday. The Herald is there to ask awkward questions not to just toady up to Adams.
I haven’t disputed that? I was talking about the interview with Daniel Nardiello published recently.
Timing is poor for me. Publish it in the summer. There’s also something called a right to response. They’re happy to post a load of critical quotes from an ex player on their website, an ex City player at that, but no sign that they asked Adams or Argyle for comment?