keyser soze":1ksrj93w said:
IJN":1ksrj93w said:
keyser soze":1ksrj93w said:
and the absolute mess that was the temporary seating.
Is that the same seating that the club decided to supply seating on a non profit basis so we could get more fans in?
That'll be the ones. I doubt the view from the directors box was as bad as anyone who had the misfortune to be sat in them, whether they chose to or not! But that's all water under the bridge, everybody in the disabled stand was compensated for the inconvenience and those in the Mayflower weren't. Okay, I've got an axe to grind on this one but I'll keep paying my money and putting up with the sh1te, I support the team not necessarily the current custodians. Anti Brent sympathies detected, ban imminent! LOL.
My view for that match was one of the worst in the ground, but I know there were a few seats with crap views in the old Mayflower.
You grind away mate, as always anything within the laws of this country are fine on this site.
However, my point was, it's a bit harsh to be hammered for something that gave about 3,000 more people a chance of seeing one of out 'biggest games' don't you think?