I actually think that Monaco is good for the sport, it is quintessentially the spirit of F1, along with Ferrari and the UK teams but it needs to improve the experience. Gone are the days of 90mph cars and 5 minute pit stops and Monaco hasn't kept up to date. There was talk about extending the circuit by adding on a loop on reclaimed land. Its not pretty but would allow clear overtaking zones and would give the race back to the fans.
I think that all circuits should provide overtaking zones and if they don't, move on as there are plenty of circuits and countries around the world crying out for a GP. Saying that, I think 3 GP's in the USA is probably 2 too many.
DRS zones only assist the better car, which is why Max can fly past the second best car ... how is that good for the sport. DRS is supposed to make the race more exiting by allowing similar paced cars to overtake each other but actually it allows the fastest cars to be even faster.
Teams spending millions more than other teams ... how can that be good for the sport.
Its a bit like the Premier League ... money money money and foreign powers who doesn't care about the sport's history.
I will leave the solution to the clever folk but essentially there needs to be an element to showcase the best drivers, there needs to be an element to allow innovation, the circuits need to create jeopardy whilst allowing drivers to excel and the race for more and more money at the cost of the racing experience needs to be curtailed.
After heavily disagreeing, I don think we’re actually that far apart in our thinking.
Something I noticed this weekend, the run between Lowe’s and Portier has a large area behind the barriers, like there’s a square or a junction with another road. That’s a short section of track which could be opened up nice and wide to give more of a flow and also reduce the tightness of Portier and the run to the tunnel. Rascasse could be widened along with the first corner, where the pitlane can exit earlier (as it used to be). In essence, there is room to make the track more suitable to modern F1. That coupled with your idea of using reclaimed land.
Costs, I’d like to see all teams paid the same rather than a sliding scale depending on championship position. All teams provide the show so all should get equal payments. Racers are there to win and the trophy should be enough. The winning teams will command better sponsorship so the will still be a reason to be successful.
I’d also like to see reduction of practice for the top teams. Something along the lines of bottom 3 teams do first practice at a weekend, the next 4 join them for fp2 with the top three joining for Saturday morning. Yes, there is a sliding scale of wind tunnel and cfd usage with the lower teams getting the most development time and this could close the gap over the next few seasons as the restrictions filter through (let’s hope so), but more restrictions for top teams will help close the field (it seems to work in MotoGP where they have ‘concessions’ for lower teams).