MarkMatthews":3vj5ak16 said:Quintrell_Green":3vj5ak16 said:We took Oscar T who they nurtured through their ranks. It might end up 'quid pro quo'. We shall soon discover. The North West, like the North East is a breeding ground for future pro footballers so it will be very competitive
It will be competitive, the mother of all uphill struggles infact. We saw that with Ty in the NE. However the fact a northern professional, club have given a trial to someone who has only ever played; non pro, southern football is great news, if they have been watching him, they will have inadvertently, seen others.
Hopefully they wonāt be able to come in for the likes of Cooper and CamSang on the cheap, given how management feel about them, they will have safeguarded the club against this sort of interest, AND develop them accordingly. But for those they couldnāt give a pancake flip about, I sincerely hope there is a way out.
The fact they donāt develop the likes of; Oscar, Kellett and Clough, is a good thing. They wonāt be competing against people their own age unfairly because they āarenāt on of their own.ā
How do you know that PAFC were not instrumental in getting this trial for him? It seems to me that you have a downer on the Club, without knowing the full facts.
Is it just co-incidental that Bolton, of all Clubs, should suddenly take notice of a youth centre half that will be discarded by PAFC at the end of the season. I cannot believe that there has been no input from Argyle in such a case. When someone is about to be released, circulation to all league clubs would be the minimum that I would expect from my Club, and a follow up from Bolton to Argyle would be appropriate before any decision would be made by them.
Just because Argyle release their younger players, that does not mean they then lose all interest in their welfare.
If Bolton have given Rose a trial, then credit should go to Argyle, not criticism.