Okay, I now see your rationale for selecting that particular issue. It doesn't really make any difference to my thoughts on the topic but I get where you are coming from.
-
This site is sponsored by Lang & Potter.
Trouble at the End (32 fans banned)
- Thread starter Welwyn Pilgrim
- Start date
is your face still red Keith, have you stopped pacing up and down refreshing your screen waiting for a reply? Make your mind up, did people "thump" each other, or was it posturing, arms out? Think we've all heard your opinion several times, time to ease off the message boards and get on with something constructive - its not good for your blood pressure
D
Deleted member 9145
Guest
I thought you werenāt interacting with me Dan. That didn't last long.
Anyway I just believe as I think most do here, and as Simon Hallett so brilliantly set out that criminal behaviour at our club should be investigated by the police and those found guilty should never be welcome a Home Park. You say that it was a "Storm in teacup" and you'd rather your tax money is spent on people illegally crossing a countries (sic) border. That's fine, no need to get red faced about it.
Anyway I just believe as I think most do here, and as Simon Hallett so brilliantly set out that criminal behaviour at our club should be investigated by the police and those found guilty should never be welcome a Home Park. You say that it was a "Storm in teacup" and you'd rather your tax money is spent on people illegally crossing a countries (sic) border. That's fine, no need to get red faced about it.
The chairman is hardly going to come out with a public statement and say "Well in lads, but next time mob up down the bottom of the Lyndhurst steps where their are no camera's" is he?
D
Deleted member 9145
Guest
No, he meant what he said that those involved were "violent wicked and never welcome at Home Park."The chairman is hardly going to come out with a public statement and say "Well in lads, but next time mob up down the bottom of the Lyndhurst steps where their are no camera's" is he?
The word I would use is criminals.
The only thing that annoys me is that the club are considering temporary stadium bans. Just ban them for life- I donāt want to be near those people now, or in the future.
The only thing that annoys me is that the club are considering temporary stadium bans. Just ban them for life- I donāt want to be near those people now, or in the future.
I bet half the people on this thread are either police officers or traffic wardens,definitely getting that bullied at school and now in life vibe to it.
To be honest, the word wicked is a bit over the top. Sutcliff was wicked, gesturing at opposition supporters does not quite compare.
Yeah I didn't like 'wicked' either. Not in the same week that a complete and utter creature killed an 18 year old girl in our City.
I know Simon is well peed off, I get that, but definitely the wrong word used there in my opinion.
I know Simon is well peed off, I get that, but definitely the wrong word used there in my opinion.
D
Deleted member 9145
Guest
Or maybe none of them are police officers or traffic wardens, none of them got bullied at school, they just don't like to see violent thugs attacking each other when they take their kids to Argyle which they're proud of and means a lot to them.
Quite. Itās worth mentioning that the Judge ruling on the death of Arthur Labinjo-Hughes described the perpetrators as āevilā and āwickedā. Those are the same individuals Iād reserve the label āscumā for. A bit of perspective is needed on this thread.
