I'm still not sure you get it. On one hand you say you understand it's not equivalent, but then on the other you claim that wearing a t-shirt saying you support a rival club and over-celebrating a goal is exactly the same as mocking the most traumatic event in someone's life and then pelting them with missiles. Sure, what he did is immature, probably ill advised, and I would hope he'll learn from it. But it doesn't justify the reaction of some of the fans, which is the whole point. It's not like he kung-fu kicked anyone (and to be fair Cantona is forever a hero for dropping that muppet).
In the end isn't the cause a cancer foundation? I'm not sure what you want him to do? Background checks for any bank account donating to make sure they don't support or represent certain football clubs he dosn't like?
I don't know what we're complaining about either way.
The truth is football NEEDS incidents like that. It makes the game awesome. Players aren't the media trained robots people seem to expect now, they're real people with real emotions and real feelings and real lives and histories, and every one of them has their own cross to bear. That's what we as fans connect to for good or for bad. I love it when home park is a bear pit. It made all the difference against Rotherham, made all the difference yesterday.
But there are lines you don't cross and whether a fan or a player. Where rivalries become spiteful and bitter and personal, and where anger becomes assault. Plus.. well.. if you look at Stansfield's record against us I'm not sure the fans winding him up about his dead dad has helped us at all!