We have already been through all this, there is a quote from that podcast that is fairly clear. Anyway it doesn't really matter, the point is that in hindsight, signing Azaz in the summer may have made a huge difference to this season, but nobody is blaming the club for not doing so.
I'm sure that we all wished that we had signed Azaz.
Signing Whittaker for £1m was a forgone conclusion.
Signing Mumba was not on the cards immediately, but became a possibility, and with his form in the previous season and winning a few trophies as well became second choice, also for £1m.
Azaz's return to us on loan was late and obviously negotiations had been taking place prior to the move, as he had been left behind from Villa's pre-season tour, and he was not fit when he joined us. Maybe words were said at the end of the previous season that it was the club's intention to purchase him prior to the start of the next season. That never happened because of the purchase of Mumba and perhaps dealing with Villa for his loan again was the reason for his late arrival. Who knows?
Just speculation on my part.
The budget was set, and it was mainly spent on Whittaker and Mumba, and we were not able to purchase Azaz.
With hindsight I am sure that we all wished we could have purchased Azaz instead of Mumba but that is all water under the bridge now, and I am sure that, at the time, there would have been a furore about not purchasing Mumba, when the opportunity to do so would have been revealed later on.
My biggest regret was the fact that he was never replaced, but perhaps the price tag of £2.5m for a replacement was well out of our pockets and it just was not possible to replace such an important piece of our jigsaw, especially in the January window.