Based on where we are after 4 years of Adams, it’s hard to see how any other candidate could have done worse. I’m sure it would have been better with Jones but as he was untried and I can see why the Board were reluctant to take a chance. It was a similar situation when Sheridan was appointed instead of Lee Johnson.Tugboat":35w2s2q6 said:To what exactly?IJN":35w2s2q6 said:I would say 'definitely not'.
It might also have been a little bit less negative and a bit more entertaining with somebody else, compared to Adams the poor-man’s Tony Pulis. All eleven players back at corners, even when we were losing with 10 minutes or less to go, 9 or 10 players behind the ball for large parts of matches whoever we were playing and sitting on 1-goal leads if we did manage to score first.
After 4 years of Adams, I think it puts Sheridan in a lot better light, rock bottom and going out of the Football League to Play-off contenders within 2 seasons and all with with the likes of Dominic Blizzard.