Balham_Green":3tgsjn79 said:Call me old fashioned but I would rather have a keeper that can save 60 yard efforts. The more experienced defenders in front can organise.
Doesn’t happen often, but I agree with Balham.
Balham_Green":3tgsjn79 said:Call me old fashioned but I would rather have a keeper that can save 60 yard efforts. The more experienced defenders in front can organise.
JannerinCardiff":y50ik2hp said:To me it’s a Goalkeeper error all day. A keeper should never be beaten by a 60 yard shot.
PL2 3DQ":2zv3cj9b said:The key issue for me is that it was a freak moment that didn't cost us the game, whereas Macey's errors are the basics of goalkeeping - regularly beaten at near post, no command of area, not collecting crosses into 6 yard box, parrying shots back into danger area - could and have cost us goals.
If Letheren regularly gets beaten by shots from the opposition half then he deserves the criticism. He deserves to keep his place until Adams signs a better keeper.
JannerinCardiff":1h3l7ltg said:Balham_Green":1h3l7ltg said:Call me old fashioned but I would rather have a keeper that can save 60 yard efforts. The more experienced defenders in front can organise.
Doesn’t happen often, but I agree with Balham.
PL2 3DQ":1wk97pkm said:The key issue for me is that it was a freak moment that didn't cost us the game, whereas Macey's errors are the basics of goalkeeping - regularly beaten at near post, no command of area, not collecting crosses into 6 yard box, parrying shots back into danger area - could and have cost us goals.
If Letheren regularly gets beaten by shots from the opposition half then he deserves the criticism. He deserves to keep his place until Adams signs a better keeper.
Ross":qznylk5g said:JannerinCardiff":qznylk5g said:I’ve seen camera angles from the halfway line and also behind the goal. From the camera behind the goal You can’t see the ball until quite late on. Letheren would have been able to see the ball from when it was kicked in Southends half. The goal didn’t go in the top corner or anything so was perfectly saveable. To me it’s a Goalkeeper error all day. A keeper should never be beaten by a 60 yard shot.
You're kidding right?
It was a fluke. Give that kid another 100 shots and he couldn't do it again.
PL2 3DQ":2zdn0aqj said:The key issue for me is that it was a freak moment that didn't cost us the game, whereas Macey's errors are the basics of goalkeeping - regularly beaten at near post, no command of area, not collecting crosses into 6 yard box, parrying shots back into danger area - could and have cost us goals.
If Letheren regularly gets beaten by shots from the opposition half then he deserves the criticism. He deserves to keep his place until Adams signs a better keeper.
Balham_Green":247qe1yt said:JannerinCardiff":247qe1yt said:Balham_Green":247qe1yt said:Call me old fashioned but I would rather have a keeper that can save 60 yard efforts. The more experienced defenders in front can organise.
Doesn’t happen often, but I agree with Balham.
Just shows how wrong you usually are then. :wave:
subbuteo":3uhszm63 said:Any rumours? Goalkeepers not included.
JannerinCardiff":2vqnq58f said:Balham_Green":2vqnq58f said:JannerinCardiff":2vqnq58f said:Balham_Green":2vqnq58f said:Call me old fashioned but I would rather have a keeper that can save 60 yard efforts. The more experienced defenders in front can organise.
Doesn’t happen often, but I agree with Balham.
Just shows how wrong you usually are then. :wave:
Or perhaps you’re right just this once..
Balham_Green":iz2q1qoa said:JannerinCardiff":iz2q1qoa said:Balham_Green":iz2q1qoa said:JannerinCardiff":iz2q1qoa said:Balham_Green":iz2q1qoa said:Call me old fashioned but I would rather have a keeper that can save 60 yard efforts. The more experienced defenders in front can organise.
Doesn’t happen often, but I agree with Balham.
Just shows how wrong you usually are then. :wave:
Or perhaps you’re right just this once..
Well as you change your mind regularly you must be right occasionally.