We don’t need one if Lowe doesn’t want one?
It isn’t really his style of football.
-
This site is sponsored by Lang & Potter.
Goals (striker debate)
- Thread starter DenverDugout
- Start date
It isn’t really his style of football.
I think he does. Why did he sign Nouble then? Sometimes you need a different option
Well Nouble was a waste of time and wages, so maybe it is a case of lesson learnt?
If the ball needs holding up, Niall Ennis will do it better than a journeyman targetman anyway. He is a much more clever, intricate player with other aspects to his game. However if that is the specific job Lowe wants doing, then Ennis can do it.
If the ball needs holding up, Niall Ennis will do it better than a journeyman targetman anyway. He is a much more clever, intricate player with other aspects to his game. However if that is the specific job Lowe wants doing, then Ennis can do it.
Yes I agree with PL2 that Broom and Garrick are realistic striking options (in event of a situation where we had no other choices).
I'm just stating the fact that Lowe has played Garrick and Broom as strikers so he must see them as an option as a striker.
I am interested in this posting as to just when and where these guys played together as strikers under Lowe?
I need enlightenment, please
They havent played together, yet. Broom played as a striker in the later stages of the Cambridge game and Garrick came on and played as a striker in the Shrewsbury game.
No evidence of an effective striking partnership then. Just great hopes in a possible crisis.
Lowe has said when he bought in Jordan Garrick that he can play up front.
www.plymouthherald.co.uk
Argyle sign Jordon Garrick from Swansea City on season-long loan
Pilgrims' boss Ryan Lowe has explained why he made the 23-year-old his ninth recruit of the summer transfer window
www.plymouthherald.co.uk
That’s correct. Quite like the look of it myself. From what I’ve seen, Broom certainly looks the part, and the way Garrick went past the fullback against Shrewsbury was awesome.
Exactly.Lowe has said when he bought in Jordan Garrick that he can play up front.
Argyle sign Jordon Garrick from Swansea City on season-long loan
Pilgrims' boss Ryan Lowe has explained why he made the 23-year-old his ninth recruit of the summer transfer window
Agree with Balham and Quintrell.
We surely can’t realistically include Broom and Mayor as striker options.
Garrick - no idea, but there’s a world of difference between developing striking partnerships (which is the main plus of 2 upfront), and throwing a midfielder upfront in hope.
We have 2 available for the next 6 weeks at least, plus a youth player who’s nowhere near ready for League 1.
Teams will continue to set up at Home Park as Gillingham and Cambridge did, able to frustrate us knowing our options to freshen up or tactically tweak inplay are minimal. I’m sure there’ll also be bruisers out to injure Hardie and Jephcott vs some of the less refined opposition, knowing we have no other options, or any other way of playing other than with a front 2.
We may get lucky. But that’s not the point.
We surely can’t realistically include Broom and Mayor as striker options.
Garrick - no idea, but there’s a world of difference between developing striking partnerships (which is the main plus of 2 upfront), and throwing a midfielder upfront in hope.
We have 2 available for the next 6 weeks at least, plus a youth player who’s nowhere near ready for League 1.
Teams will continue to set up at Home Park as Gillingham and Cambridge did, able to frustrate us knowing our options to freshen up or tactically tweak inplay are minimal. I’m sure there’ll also be bruisers out to injure Hardie and Jephcott vs some of the less refined opposition, knowing we have no other options, or any other way of playing other than with a front 2.
We may get lucky. But that’s not the point.
