The latter problem is changing but I think people are taking it a little too far. Its a bit of fun and I feel people are playing within their means, I admire your worry but its other peoples problems not yours.
andyr1963":gh10ma3g said:Between 19 / 1 and 26 / 1 Argyle to be Champions
https://www.oddschecker.com/football/en ... e-1/winner
It does make a difference where you bet, all the more so if placing in an accumulator.
mervyn":2uv7ektm said:andyr1963":2uv7ektm said:Between 19 / 1 and 26 / 1 Argyle to be Champions
https://www.oddschecker.com/football/en ... e-1/winner
It does make a difference where you bet, all the more so if placing in an accumulator.
Please educate me. Are these odds reflecting bookies’ opinions, or do they relate to bets placed so far?
Lancastergreen":3eb4plee said:The latter problem is changing but I think people are taking it a little too far. Its a bit of fun and I feel people are playing within their means, I admire your worry but its other peoples problems not yours.
X Isle":vorche3r said:I haven't. Betting is a mugs game.
While I think of it, I noticed a trend creeping in, and growing, last season. Boring repetitive 'odds chat' spreading across multiple threads that it has no place.
This thread fair enough, it's titled appropriately so I could've avoided it. But regular niche sub conversations within the (insert team here) threads?, every thread towards the end of the season discussing play-off or promotion prospects?... unnecessary and dull.
Betting companies have already insidiously infected football, plastered all over shirts, football stadia and live game advertising.
Please don't let betting infect football message boards too. Leave us one sanctuary from Ray bleedin Winstone and his "world's most popular bettin' caaaaaaampany" :yawn:
Ex players bank rolling investment and paying players 4K a week.Lancastergreen":nvaaykxr said:What's happening at Salford?