Well no point knocking it long because Hardie isn't the sort of centre forward to win it in the air
But we do - often. That’s the point of my post.
Well no point knocking it long because Hardie isn't the sort of centre forward to win it in the air
Its not 50/50 with HardieRyan is not know for his heading, but he won his fair share on Tuesday to be fair. And so he should, he's 6'2.
Back to the kicking it long, we should mix it up, but as soon as you hit something long it becomes a 50/50 ball.
I can't see how we can get CBs in the opposition half too often.I was not advocating hitting it long to Ryan Hardie for obvious reasons but more targetted to a CB in the opposition half. It worked with Phillips a few times on Tuesday - more than it would with others. Coops does have the ability to hit or throw it over a high line where Ryan would thrive. Away from home that is a possibility but not at Home Park. The absence of a tall player with physical presence as an option was undeniably a recruitment failure in the two windows this season
Only from goal kicks as we did on Tuesday. Eliminates the 'from me to you' six yard box play that rarely enable us to progress up the pitch. Coops kicked wide to Phillips in the opposition half on at least three occasions and we won the second ball in an advanced area and did so quickly.I can't see how we can get CBs in the opposition half too often.
Of course what we miss is a Danny Mayor type(very underrated by some) who could run with the ball and transition through the thirds. Plus we had Cosgrove as another option with a bit more physical presence. How we hoped to stay up with what we have I have no idea.
Way back when Gazza was playing for England I often used to say to people "He is good for our defence because all the while he runs with and retains the ball, we are not conceding goals or possession. Back then I don't think we had terms like 'transition through the thirds' but denying the opposition the ball is good whoever does it and wherever they are. Just out of interest, do you think Danny would have cut it at this level? (Genuine question and not an argument or opinion) From what I read, some Fleetwood fans are greatly disappointed that he has not had the impact they had believed he would.Of course what we miss is a Danny Mayor type(very underrated by some) who could run with the ball and transition through the thirds. Plus we had Cosgrove as another option with a bit more physical presence. How we hoped to stay up with what we have I have no idea.
Yes I think he would. Not every week maybe but definitely something extra we don't have. He had no end product in League 1 so nothing would have changed in Championship!Way back when Gazza was playing for England I often used to say to people "He is good for our defence because all the while he runs with and retains the ball, we are not conceding goals or possession. Back then I don't think we had terms like 'transition through the thirds' but denying the opposition the ball is good whoever does it and wherever they are. Just out of interest, do you think Danny would have cut it at this level? (Genuine question and not an argument or opinion) From what I read, some Fleetwood fans are greatly disappointed that he has not had the impact they had believed he would.
Way back when Gazza was playing for England I often used to say to people "He is good for our defence because all the while he runs with and retains the ball, we are not conceding goals or possession. Back then I don't think we had terms like 'transition through the thirds' but denying the opposition the ball is good whoever does it and wherever they are. Just out of interest, do you think Danny would have cut it at this level? (Genuine question and not an argument or opinion) From what I read, some Fleetwood fans are greatly disappointed that he has not had the impact they had believed he would.
That is a good point re Callum v Danny. I had not looked at it that way.He’s another one who seems to need to be loved and have the right fit. Not sure what the regime is like at Fleetwood but I’m absolutely certain he would have struggled under Foster. But right now, would you play Wright or Mayor? No disrespect to Callum but I know who I'd be choosing.
Like BG, over the course of the season he would definitely given us a bit more offensively. Enough fine margins to make a difference IMO.
A fast press is more reason not to play the ball quickly to our CBs. He was inaccurate on a couple of occasions but partly down a lack of movement from the outfield playersAlways been on the fence with the Cooper Hazard argument but I’ve been impressed and reassured with Coopers performances to date, but I was’t overly impressed with his distribution last night, too slow far too slow.
Against a team pressing as high and as quick as QPR did last night I thought on a quite a few occasions he put our defence under even more pressure with slow and sometimes inaccurate distribution.
Just to reiterate I have been very impressed with Cooper to date so hopefully just a temporary blip.
I agree when there are no options but there were, from my seat in block 3 we could have between the press, on some occasions, by more decisive decision making by Cooper. On occasions you could see Edwards and Mumba holding their hand in the air as if to say ‘give me the ball’ presumably either directly or via the CB’s.A fast press is more reason not to play the ball quickly to our CBs. He was inaccurate on a couple of occasions but partly down a lack of movement from the outfield players