Some of these infrastructure projects directly generate more revenue (I'd prefer the word profit) like the original Grandstand refurb. Some increase the "customer experience" which leads to larger attendances (more revenue), for example the Big Screen, upgraded catering etc.Totally agree.
We are spending on infrastructure to be able to generate more revenue - which in turn will be spent on the players budget. This is a long term strategic approach that I fully endorse if we are to be able to compete longer term with bigger more financially strong clubs.
However, a project like the new training facility, whilst hopefully increasing the lure of Argyle to prospective signings and improving the ability of all our players, isn't likely to be a significant direct generator of revenue/profit, particularly as there are likely to be increased costs in running it. So infrastructure improvement does not all necessarily directly relate to increased spending power. There is a huge spending gap currently between ourselves and the biggest spenders even in our league. Is it realistic to expect the infrastructure improvements currently planned to significantly close these gaps, and also close on the spending power of clubs in the league above?