They don't spend a huge amount, they build gradually and are very consistent in around top 9/10 clubs in Championship
Makes you wonder why Colchester, Gillingham and Southend have been less successful than Bristol City or Argyle if London money and airport accessibility is that important a criteria in a football clubs fortunes.While on the basis of the above they might be comparable, Norwich City FC are part-owned by a group of American investors headed by the club Director, Michael Attanasio, who alone is worth $700m.
So it's not just the logistics that impact a football club. The wealth spread that ripples out from London isn't simply underpinned by logistics and, as Norwich is about as far from London by crow as we are from Bristol, the commercial appeal of Norwich City FC is proven as greater than that of Plymouth Argyle FC.
This commercial difference is further strengthened by our lack of airport while Norwich has it's own which, to an extent, circumvents some of the logistical pressures presented by location.
I mean, that's what - 30-40mins to London. It takes us longer to get to an airport.
Failing something remarkable, simple economics will always dictate our prospects and simple economics are the stark factors that separate Argyle from Norwich in the modern game.
Norwich are also not realistically comparable to Argyle.
Not pessimism mate, just realism.I think this is a very pessimistic outlook. I agree that our geographical location can be a struggle to attract some players. However this will be a huge ADVANTAGE when he get Brickfields up and running. We should then be in a positikn to have the best academy in the south west, and have a vast catchment area to develop talent and sell on at profit.
I've not made a study of other clubs' finances - or Argyle's for that matter - but my impression is that Bristol City is a basket-case. I read somewhere, or maybe heard on a Kevin Maguire podcast that for a decade they have been losing £400k+ a week. Landsdowne has pumped £240M of his own money into the club - to achieve no more than your "almost always solidly mid-table". I think (but cannot be sure) that only the Covid closure of the stadium stopped them falling foul of the FFP regulations and that their recent accounts just avoided a points deduction. They were patting themselves on the back for getting the wage bill down from £35M to £30M.The obvious choice - to me at least - is to look (relatively) close to home amongst the other Championship clubs: Bristol City. Next season will mark a decade spent in this league, almost always solidly mid-table, occasionally threatening the playoffs. In that time they've had peaks and troughs in spending: £8m for Han-Noah Massengo in 2019 was the biggest known outlay in that time, as far as I can see, but that was in a transfer window where they received over £40m in fees so it hardly seems like reckless spending. Some years they relied on free transfers and players costing six figures rather than seven. To me that seems the exact model we want to be emulating for the next few seasons. You could perhaps say that's not ambitious enough, but we all saw how Roy Gardner's five year plan went.
While on the basis of the above they might be comparable, Norwich City FC are part-owned by a group of American investors headed by the club Director, Michael Attanasio, who alone is worth $700m.
Do you not think the commercial draw of Delia carried weight?Only in the last year or so, but their recent times in the Premier League were under Delia.
It seems silly to be saying the Premier League is totally unrealistic, when you’re in the division directly below it and finishing in the top quarter of it gives you a play-off lottery ticket.
No your not boaring just live in the real world,Not pessimism mate, just realism.
While the future investment in the academy does, on paper, offer great scope for the club, the appeal needs to stretch to getting the right people in at the right levels of coaching and development, then comes the prospect of them being poached by other clubs.
As for the youth prospects themselves - our academy could well develop a production line of great talent, but the modern urgency of the big clubs to meet the homegrown quota in the most cost-effective manner will be the reason that every single academy respective to clubs without the benefits of vast wealth and/or greater commercial value will see only modest return for that investment.
I'm not dismissing the idea of further investment in our academy - I absolutely want it, but the return will be dictated by market conditions.
These conditions will subsequently dictate any influence upon all other factors at the club and will have no impact on the premise that any club in the country can really be compared to Argyle.
I'm not saying I don't dream of seeing the Green Machine in the PL, in Europe - of course I do, but my reality is tailored by tangible factors.
Maybe I'm just a boring bugger. 😂