blenks":32es35xz said:
I agree, very scary, yeah he talks but what does he actually say, it's all the same bull and only what he thinks you want to hear, we need someone we can trust after this lot.
-
This site is sponsored by Lang & Potter.
I agree, very scary, yeah he talks but what does he actually say, it's all the same bull and only what he thinks you want to hear, we need someone we can trust after this lot.
Keepitgreen
🇰🇪 Welicar Donor
♣️ PACSA Member
♣️ Senior Greens
✅ Evergreen
✨Pasoti Donor✨
🌟Sparksy Mural🌟
Either of the admin options for me. I gather that the 3 who have gone for A are either relatives of the directors or have done so with the loss to local businesses in mind. I also feel for them but admin and getting shot of ALL the current lot really is the only way forward.
G
Green Goblin
Guest
tonycholwell":1bq1uwa1 said:
Sums up my position as well. I would not boycott a Ridsdale led ownership like I would if the current shower remain in post but I wouldn't be able to sit comfortably until he was gone. I would be constantly waiting for all of this to hit the fan again.
I want this to be a one off in our club's history and i don't see that being the case with either the current owners or ridsdale moving forward.
A
Anonymous
Guest
granted you have a point. Im for admin with ridsdale. I just believe after this shocking 6 months of hell. I dont think it could be any worse. At least he has something our board and possible investors dont have. A love of football and the nouce to go with it. Hey, if it came to ridsdales option come tomorrow I just hope I wont be proved wrong. We will always have different views but we all only want one thing, stabillity. Its been a long timesharkbait":y8i6gdk9 said:
dave-1975-pafc":2u8fjbaw said:
There maybe a few Leeds And Cardiff fans that disagree with you on 'stability and Ridsdale' being used in the same sentence, the blokes a chancer and this club have had enough of them.
B
blenks
Guest
Admin with a new board - NO Ridsdale.
Least unattractive of the four propositions, but only just. I don't want any more multi-millionnaires because they never spend any actual money and just cream money out the club. Potentially we could be driven into an even deeper mire if any new incumbent wanted to start gambling with his new toy.
In an ideal world maybe someone could come in who could just babysit us (and our debts) for a few years while we find our feet and re-learn how to walk. Once we're solvent and over the worst of it then stick to a truly 'organic' model and stay that way. No more stupidity/negligence, only a focus on community and producing football and football players.
Least unattractive of the four propositions, but only just. I don't want any more multi-millionnaires because they never spend any actual money and just cream money out the club. Potentially we could be driven into an even deeper mire if any new incumbent wanted to start gambling with his new toy.
In an ideal world maybe someone could come in who could just babysit us (and our debts) for a few years while we find our feet and re-learn how to walk. Once we're solvent and over the worst of it then stick to a truly 'organic' model and stay that way. No more stupidity/negligence, only a focus on community and producing football and football players.
O
oggyale
Guest
A
Anonymous
Guest
Keepitgreen
🇰🇪 Welicar Donor
♣️ PACSA Member
♣️ Senior Greens
✅ Evergreen
✨Pasoti Donor✨
🌟Sparksy Mural🌟
dave-1975-pafc":2xpuj4g3 said:
139 voters revisitting 6 times to see how the vote's going. The other 49 are just curious.
I voted for new owners with Ridsdale'
I'd be happy without him but I really do believe that he is the "sharp" sort of person needed to keep Argyle "ahead of the game".
I'd be happy without him but I really do believe that he is the "sharp" sort of person needed to keep Argyle "ahead of the game".
N
Neil Corner
Guest
I voted admin without Ridders as things stand, but all i know for certain is that the 7 must go.
