Seriously, whether you agree with CF staying on or the appointment of a DoF, the statements in the press today from Mr Sexstone just compound the view that we haven't got a clue!
Firstly, an appointment to the end of the season is now a permanent post. Okay, those two things are reconcilable, as the person appointed may, in effect, be on probation, but the post permanent...but it still smacks of a change.
Secondly, the person appointed will 'bring a wealth of experience to help the manager'.....BUT....'will have no influence on team selection or tactics'. I'm sorry, but if they can't 'influence' this, then what, exactly, is the point!? Okay, I can accept that they are not responsible, but they can't even influence!?
How the hell is 'dealing with budgets, contracts and the like' going to support Carl Fletcher's performance and skills as a coach? It's just going to give him more time, by not doing the 'admin'. Why do you need a Director of Football to do that?
Why would the likes of Gary Megson, Colin Lee, Glenn Roeder want to come and do a job where they can't even 'influence' the underperforming manager and first team?
Surely a DoF should be setting the long term football strategy at all levels, shaping the style of play, reviewing the training and fitness regimes, setting targets and expectations for the various teams etc and the first team manager should be delivering his part of that strategy? If a DoF was doing these things then they would be influencing team selection and tactics.....and that is exactly what is needed.
Maybe it's poor choice of words by Mr Sexstone, but more and more this just seems like a knee jerk reaction to try and appease the fans with the facade that everything is changing.....when in fact, nothing is changing.
Firstly, an appointment to the end of the season is now a permanent post. Okay, those two things are reconcilable, as the person appointed may, in effect, be on probation, but the post permanent...but it still smacks of a change.
Secondly, the person appointed will 'bring a wealth of experience to help the manager'.....BUT....'will have no influence on team selection or tactics'. I'm sorry, but if they can't 'influence' this, then what, exactly, is the point!? Okay, I can accept that they are not responsible, but they can't even influence!?
How the hell is 'dealing with budgets, contracts and the like' going to support Carl Fletcher's performance and skills as a coach? It's just going to give him more time, by not doing the 'admin'. Why do you need a Director of Football to do that?
Why would the likes of Gary Megson, Colin Lee, Glenn Roeder want to come and do a job where they can't even 'influence' the underperforming manager and first team?
Surely a DoF should be setting the long term football strategy at all levels, shaping the style of play, reviewing the training and fitness regimes, setting targets and expectations for the various teams etc and the first team manager should be delivering his part of that strategy? If a DoF was doing these things then they would be influencing team selection and tactics.....and that is exactly what is needed.
Maybe it's poor choice of words by Mr Sexstone, but more and more this just seems like a knee jerk reaction to try and appease the fans with the facade that everything is changing.....when in fact, nothing is changing.