That's assuming it all goes into the playing budget, and all goes into a playing budget for one season. It wouldn't work like that. If sold for £20m, we don't know what Swansea's cut is, I've seen people mentioning 25%-30%, if we go for the lower amount that would give Swansea £5m, so we're looking at £15m. Now I could be wrong, but I'm sure I've seen or heard that 50% of transfers at the moment goes towards the playing budget and 50% towards off-field stuff. That would still mean £7.5m, which is nice, but transfer fees aren't generally paid all in one go. You can probably expect that to be spread over about three years. When looking at a playing budget you'd probably want to spread out the budget over three years anyway because you'd need to cover wages over the full length of a contract. So that would mean over three seasons we might be able to increase our overall playing budget by £2.5m a year. That wouldn't mean spending £2.5m on an individual player, because then you've got nothing in the pot for wages for that player.