ealinggreen":1fryva51 said:I did not realize on the day,but that looks a nailed on penalty involving Ladapo.
arrythewurzel":380hdcnr said:ealinggreen":380hdcnr said:I did not realize on the day,but that looks a nailed on penalty involving Ladapo.
Not to mention the one where Carey's leg is taken. The one where Sarcevic goes down is a foul anywhere else on the pitch and I think Joel was fouled just after.
I said at the time that Ladapo does not go down with a dive in that position - ref bottled it knowing it was a sending off too.
ealinggreen":31jr9sfd said:Sorry Balham he is behind him and goes through his leg to get to the ball.Penalty.
arrythewurzel":m2elxpyr said:ealinggreen":m2elxpyr said:I did not realize on the day,but that looks a nailed on penalty involving Ladapo.
Not to mention the one where Carey's leg is taken. The one where Sarcevic goes down is a foul anywhere else on the pitch and I think Joel was fouled just after.
rsp4":2g5t11ou said:As I sit in the Demport I couldn't see either incident now looking at Charlie's angles the first one is a foul that really winds me up with refs. If tackling from behind is against the rules then it's a pen but refs are so inconsistent with this rule.
The assault on Sarcs is a pen all day long. That looks like 2 stone wall shouts in two home games. Their defender didn't even attempt to get the ball but just panicked when Sarcs nicked it off him
Balham_Green":2wpct42t said:rsp4":2wpct42t said:As I sit in the Demport I couldn't see either incident now looking at Charlie's angles the first one is a foul that really winds me up with refs. If tackling from behind is against the rules then it's a pen but refs are so inconsistent with this rule.
The assault on Sarcs is a pen all day long. That looks like 2 stone wall shouts in two home games. Their defender didn't even attempt to get the ball but just panicked when Sarcs nicked it off him
Tackling from behind is NOT against the rules if you get the ball, only if you take a players' legs first. Perfectly legal challenge.
Bermudian Green":1otb1jvo said:Balham_Green":1otb1jvo said:rsp4":1otb1jvo said:As I sit in the Demport I couldn't see either incident now looking at Charlie's angles the first one is a foul that really winds me up with refs. If tackling from behind is against the rules then it's a pen but refs are so inconsistent with this rule.
The assault on Sarcs is a pen all day long. That looks like 2 stone wall shouts in two home games. Their defender didn't even attempt to get the ball but just panicked when Sarcs nicked it off him
Tackling from behind is NOT against the rules if you get the ball, only if you take a players' legs first. Perfectly legal challenge.
That's not strictly true. The laws make no mention of whether the ball was touched or not, it's still a tackle from behind. The ref has to decide whether the challenge was reckless, careless or with excessive force. If he got the ball from behind but with excessive force, it's a foul.