Ditto, but at least his criticisms are constructive. This is a public forum after all, imagine ridiculing somebody for investing too much time in stating their opinion. If it winds you both up so much, then block him.
Green_Flash":2avs49uc said:This result has been coming for a while, we have ridden our luck at times in the last few matches and have come up against re-vitalised team and paid the price. Sony Bradley's absence is hurting us badly and unfortunately the midfield, Carey in particular seems to have lost its creative spark, hopefully only temporarily. Ultimately though I think Charlton did a job on us and on balance more credit should go to them than criticism to Argyle.
If I have a criticism of Adams this season is that there is not enough strength in depth. Every time a first teamer gets injured, the replacement isn't up to the job by a long chalk and is costing us dear. We saw it in particular with Taylor and now we are seeing it with Bradley
Two defeats in nineteen games isn't bad form. We do need Bradley back though.Green_Flash":3vbfprey said:We need to beat Southend and hopefully get a draw at Scunny and we are right back on track - my concern is more the current level of performance than our league position - especially defensively.
Kentishgreen":o1j2eqsm said:Green Flash is worried about our current performance, defensively. Iād be a bit more worried about our attack. Iām surprised the Charlton keeper didnāt bring out a deckchair in the second half as he was not put under any pressure whatsoever. Hardly a shot all game. I hope it was a blip but I think Iād be more concerned with our attack - or lack of one on Saturdays performance.
Kentishgreen":10cuzxlt said:Green Flash is worried about our current performance, defensively. Iād be a bit more worried about our attack. Iām surprised the Charlton keeper didnāt bring out a deckchair in the second half as he was not put under any pressure whatsoever. Hardly a shot all game. I hope it was a blip but I think Iād be more concerned with our attack - or lack of one on Saturdays performance.
Fergy":1d8yiszc said:We just arenāt the same team offensively without Sarcevic. Granted, we scored 3 goals against Rovers but none were against the run of play so to speak. Without him and Bradley, we look a very average L1 team.
If Wigan can lose 3 or 4 players and still play well, it's a good squad.Mark Pedlar":3dioxox0 said:Biggs - there are 3 good sides in Div 1. There are 4-7 poor sides in Div 1. The rest are average. You cannot ignore the first 20 or so games because the results don't suit your argument. Success or failure is taken over a season.
Without certain key players we are a poor team - see start of season. With everyone on form, we're a good team. By definition that's average.