Greenskin":2l6q9s6j said:The glorious 12th.Or maybe not.
The 12th of never.
(Apologies if anyone's already said this - couldn't be bothered to read through the whole thread, sorry!)
Greenskin":2l6q9s6j said:The glorious 12th.Or maybe not.
X Isle":1lbi6byb said:PL2 3DQ":1lbi6byb said:Let's start a sweepstake!
I'm going out on a limb and saying the whole season.
Ridsdale already hinted that they can go the whole season in administration if needs be. But with the question of the Football League share still very much a bone of contention due to Heaneys involvement and with Heaney having no money to actually do the deal anyway you can see how prevaracation is desireable.
All the while we stay in administration Heaney is not the owner of the land and is not providing the seasons working capital so the hurdle about whether he has influence doesn't need to be negotiated. On paper the club is in the care of Brendan Guilfoyle who is not connected to any other football club - ergo we get allowed to fullfil fixtures in the meantime.
All the while we stay in administration Heaney doesn't have to find any money. He has a whole year to scurry round looking for investors.
All the while we stay in administration wages can keep being added to the creditors bill for later payment (or not because the bigger the bills eventually become the better the case they actually have to negotiate downwards). The contemptuous way the staff have already been treated causes me to have no doubt that over a large brandy or two in some swanky club the three amigos (and Davie makes four!) have concluded that if they're suckers enough to work unpaid for eight months already they they can carry on working for nothing indefinately.
There isn't an incentive to come out of administration right now, not that they can anyway because Heaney DOESN'T have the money. This will go on and on, i'm surprised they're not managing expectations a little better TBH, months forward not weeks. If i'm cynical (and it's been spot on to be just that so far, they are self confessed liars afterall) i'd say they're looking to maximise season ticket sales before the season starts. They'll then figure that's all the ST's they're going to get and you'll then get the announcement the administration process will go on indefinately.
It gives Heaney time to ditch Truro.
It gives Heaney time to find some money.
It gives Ridsdale time to get the club running on a shoestring.
It gives Ridsdale time to allow the poor results that will inevitably follow to justify dismissing Reidy and appoint his own man.
grovehill":3dllmbup said:Palace started last season in Administration, I see no reason why PAFC can't.
As long as income covers expenditure, PAFC could stay in admin all season, as have other clubs, I believe.
And with staff asked to defer wages indefinitely, that shouldn't be a problem.
As some of you are vehemently opposed to the current PB's, wouldn't that be better than ending up with the "wrong" owner?
And what happens when we have to come out of administration before the League's AGM?
PS We don't need to have a certain number of profesional players on the books-as long as we send out 11 registered players, we can fulfil our fixtures-that could include Reidy,Sadler Kevin Hodges, Alun Evans etc. As long as they are registered with the FL (like Paul Tisdale was with Exeter last season), we can use 'em
We might not win them though, but still, hey-ho, as long as there's an Argyle team to watch what does it matter, eh?
Rush Goalie":1jkor7s8 said:The media should be all over the further lapse in deadline date.
Peter Ryan":bbr0m32d said:Also, so you know , we didn't "waylay" David Jones, we came across him as we returned to our seats at the start of last night's second half and took the opportunity to ask him a couple of polite questions, which he answered politely too.
Rush Goalie":gb2hnwth said:The media should be all over the further lapse in deadline date.
IJN":zqzsf65k said:Peter Ryan":zqzsf65k said:Also, so you know , we didn't "waylay" David Jones, we came across him as we returned to our seats at the start of last night's second half and took the opportunity to ask him a couple of polite questions, which he answered politely too.
My apologies Peter, I saw you 'loitering' then I saw you speaking to him.
Must have been my cynical mind at work.
Abbotts Ann Green":1bb64bvm said:And can if just be mentioned (again) that BG is there to look after the interests of the people and firms who have lost money which may not necessarily mean he will be looking after the best interests of the club.
loyal1970":27q9u4av said:this is taking the p$$s now and looking at the pictures off heaney the smug looking barsteward being rushed into the board room flanked by security who the f$$k do you think you are.