Pilgrim_Joe":owuhcjx0 said:Personally I think rail seating in certain areas of the ground is actually safer than standard seating.
Many fans like to stand and do. Often happens in the Barn Park with away fans.
If people stand in standard seating the seat back in front is much lower than a rail.
I'd love to see some at Argyle.
Just my opinion
Lundan Cabbie":2gi4kxl0 said:There is nothing for the Government to gain by changing the current legislation. They play a different game. A game of votes rather than points. When the safe standing issue provides votes, theyâll play ball.
Part of the reasons clubs are saying they want it is that 1.5 people can fit in each space so you get more people in. That doesn't add up with what you've said.Lundan Cabbie":yab9zdcb said:Pilgrim_Joe":yab9zdcb said:Personally I think rail seating in certain areas of the ground is actually safer than standard seating.
Many fans like to stand and do. Often happens in the Barn Park with away fans.
If people stand in standard seating the seat back in front is much lower than a rail.
I'd love to see some at Argyle.
Just my opinion
If used as intended rail seating would be safer. It is deigned to have one person in each standing position but in practice we know what will happen. Supporters wonât necessarily stand in their allotted place and will move to be with their mates or to stand with fans who sing and chant. It happens now in seated areas where it ends up with more people in rows than there are seats and in safe standing areas will occur even more so.
Argy1e":3f4qt2ob said:Part of the reasons clubs are saying they want it is that 1.5 people can fit in each space so you get more people in. That doesn't add up with what you've said.Lundan Cabbie":3f4qt2ob said:Pilgrim_Joe":3f4qt2ob said:Personally I think rail seating in certain areas of the ground is actually safer than standard seating.
Many fans like to stand and do. Often happens in the Barn Park with away fans.
If people stand in standard seating the seat back in front is much lower than a rail.
I'd love to see some at Argyle.
Just my opinion
If used as intended rail seating would be safer. It is deigned to have one person in each standing position but in practice we know what will happen. Supporters wonât necessarily stand in their allotted place and will move to be with their mates or to stand with fans who sing and chant. It happens now in seated areas where it ends up with more people in rows than there are seats and in safe standing areas will occur even more so.
Argy1e":8d3o3xkj said:Part of the reasons clubs are saying they want it is that 1.5 people can fit in each space so you get more people in. That doesn't add up with what you've said.Lundan Cabbie":8d3o3xkj said:Pilgrim_Joe":8d3o3xkj said:Personally I think rail seating in certain areas of the ground is actually safer than standard seating.
Many fans like to stand and do. Often happens in the Barn Park with away fans.
If people stand in standard seating the seat back in front is much lower than a rail.
I'd love to see some at Argyle.
Just my opinion
If used as intended rail seating would be safer. It is deigned to have one person in each standing position but in practice we know what will happen. Supporters wonât necessarily stand in their allotted place and will move to be with their mates or to stand with fans who sing and chant. It happens now in seated areas where it ends up with more people in rows than there are seats and in safe standing areas will occur even more so.