Am I right in thinking this might be the first season, for a while, without a Championship Club getting a points deduction? Just our luck! Reading, Wigan, Derby and Sheffield Wednesday have all been hit with deductions in the last 3 or 4 seasons.
Indeed. Although some do think we should be spending all of his money. Including money he doesn't even have!thank goodness we have simon et al running our club.
Makes no odds. Lets be truthful we are either the 3rd or 4th worse football team in the championship.Am I right in thinking this might be the first season, for a while, without a Championship Club getting a points deduction? Just our luck! Reading, Wigan, Derby and Sheffield Wednesday have all been hit with deductions in the last 3 or 4 seasons.
no, that was an incorrect / out of date price on the summary page of Oddschecker for Swansea.Is this anything to do with the betting odds posted the other day which had Swansea with higher odds of relegation compared to us?
If the money is by way of owner equity investment rather than loans, why would us fans care? I would welcome that sort of investment, although I would hope for a better return for the money obviously.Swansea have lost close to £30 million in the last 2 years.
Their turnover for 22/23 was £21.5 million. They lost £17.9. Therefore they spent £39.4 million in 22/23.
This is ridiculous.
I'd rather get relegated than run the club like Swansea are allowed to do by the extremely lax FA and EFL rules.
When we stay up on Saturday let's keep in perspective what an amazing achievement it will be with our budget and financial security that Simon Hallett insists on compared to the money madness of the other clubs.
Mervyn I do not think football investment is rational from an economic point of view. But you are talking about people so wealthy they dont really know what to spend their money on and for them £20m a season to enjoy running a football club and dreaming of the premier league may be worth it, they are still going to be able to afford all the other luxuries they are accustomed to so they are not sacrificing much in real terms but gaining a significant interest.I think there is some naïveté about the sustainability of Championship club losses, which last year averaged £21 million. Think about it. If you are a multi-billionaire corporation or individual, then spending £21 million as a punt to gain Prem. riches if all goes well is about the equivalent of someone on an average salary betting £100 on the same outcome. The assumption these clubs must ultimately go broke is daft. History shows that disappointed rich owners just sell on to the next lot with money to burn on a similar punt. Until the governing bodies acquire the balls to demand real world financial sustainability then nothing will change imo.
I agree GF. It’s only rational if you are a billionaire, and they are sacrificing nothing because they can afford to lose it.Mervyn I do not think football investment is rational from an economic point of view. But you are talking about people so wealthy they dont really know what to spend their money on and for them £20m a season to enjoy running a football club and dreaming of the premier league may be worth it, they are still going to be able to afford all the other luxuries they are accustomed to so they are not sacrificing much in real terms but gaining a significant interest.
Yes, at league one somebody who is wealthy but not worth hundreds of millions can afford to own a club largely as a hobby, as Simon has done, at championship level, unfortunately, you need a next level of wealth.I agree GF. It’s only rational if you are a billionaire, and they are sacrificing nothing because they can afford to lose it.
Reads like they have a very accommodating Bank Manager !Last season Swansea spent 100% of their turnover on wages and are losing £350k a week . Over the course of this season the Swansea owners have invested £5m into the club .
If we stay in the Championship, then absolutely yes someone might pay £20m plus for Argyle now. Whittaker and Cooper could generate transfer fee income of over half that at least.If the money is by way of owner equity investment rather than loans, why would us fans care?
I would agree with this to a point but the issue is that every time an owner puts more in the paper 'value' of the club goes up. For example, would anyone buy plymouth argyle for £20m plus. I really doubt it which causes a problem when the owner moves on. then again another mug punter seems to always come along.