A player valued at £8m has legitimate wage expectations that we cannot meet. So, unless he is prepared to accept a far lower wage than he is worth he is going to be leaving us and that should be now rather than next year when his contract expires. Further, however good he is the opportunity cost of £8m is huge if we we dont sell him. We are not rich enough to justify an £8m value keeper, we would be better spreading that value around the squad including a replacement keeper if Hazard (who lets not forget only cost £150,000) is not deemed good enough.I know many will feel like £8m for Coops is good business for Argyle, especially given his recent multiple kneeknacks, but I’m not convinced.
I genuinely believe he can grow into a top 10 keeper in the country, and will win England caps. I think there’s every chance if we extended him for a couple more years that £8m price tag would become £15m or even more, and we’d have two more years of the best GK outside the premier league. Hazard is adequate, sure – although I have my misgivings about his linerootedness, presence and distribution – and adequacy is a serious downgrade on excellence.
The clubs model is that we nurture great players, sell them on, and then do it all over again. If Cooper does not fall into that category I do not know who does. Just make sure we have a sell on percentage in case he turns out to be world class (which personally I do not rule out)
Last edited: