Phillips and Devine

[SurreyJanner]

It’s a no from me.

So you don't rate Phillips or Gibson, who exactly do you like the look of?

 

[Altarnun Green]

I wasn't, no. But the games before that, that I did watch, he seemed to be pedestrian, ineffective and offered nothing. In my opinion.

Or Stoke away? When he came on looked like the only Argyle player who was going to make something happen.

 

[oldage]

So you don't rate Phillips or Gibson, who exactly do you like the look of?

IMO Scarr is a very good defender. I don’t rate Gibson as much as some fans for reasons I have already expressed and to me whilst having a lot of potential , this season Phillips has shown his inexperience . The championship is a hard uncompromising league and it has literally been men against boys in some games .

 

[JannerinCardiff]

IMO Scarr is a very good defender. I don’t rate Gibson as much as some fans for reasons I have already expressed and to me whilst having a lot of potential , this season Phillips has shown his inexperience . The championship is a hard uncompromising league and it has literally been men against boys in some games .

You think Dan Scarr is better than Gibson.??? Whilst I have fondness for DS, but sorry don't agree with that at all.

 

[Greenfrom83]

Glad I’m not the only one. We know he has the pedigree but so did Foster. In my mind he is what he is a very good 18 year old but just not up to the rigours of championship.

and for one so young, I've never seen someone go down with cramp as much as he does.....must be an ongoing issue and not 'growing pains'. there's a a good prospect in there though.

 

[oldage]

You think Dan Scarr is better than Gibson.??? Whilst I have fondness for DS, but sorry don't agree with that at all.

Perhaps because of my age I prefer the good old blood and snotters defenders. Scarr may not be the fastest but he’s the type you would need with you in the trenches. Same sort as Coughlan, Bradley, Provan etc.

 

[Flag Hippo]

You didn’t see him against Coventry then ?

You didn't see him against Bristol City then?

 

[Frank the Phone]

I wasn't, no. But the games before that, that I did watch, he seemed to be pedestrian, ineffective and offered nothing. In my opinion.

In the final game he was played in his natural position, and looked a different player.

 

[Flag Hippo]

In the final game he was played in his natural position, and looked a different player.

What is his natural position?

 

[Frank the Phone]

What is his natural position?

I would say a deep lying playmaking type role, like a quarter back. Linking between the defence and attack but with the odd long range incisive pass. That's the role he played at Vale, I believe.