:lol:MickyD":byyvjt14 said:I'm praying that Liverpool hammer the hell out of Chelsea tomorrow, not just because I want Liverpool to win the title and to pass a remarkable 100 League goals while doing so, but also because I'll be eager to see if Mourinho will manage to top even that graceless display of a week ago - assuming he would even deign to appear before the cameras in such circumstances.
Maybe the Chelsea press officer will be obliged to put The Spoilt One's words of wisdom to reporters via the medium of interpretative dance. :greensmile:
Cornish Chris":2y85d8l4 said:Absolutely gutted that Chelsea won today. If they win the double I'm done with football.
As, I think, is the previous post about "Cockney Scousers". Must we wish ill on a club just because their success without the help of "plastics" then inevitably attracts some plastics?Lundan Cabbie":3pivs8c5 said:Cornish Chris":3pivs8c5 said:Absolutely gutted that Chelsea won today. If they win the double I'm done with football.
I can understand favouring one side over another but do you really care who wins it? To say you will be done with football is dramatically OTT.
MickyD":31t26io0 said:As, I think, is the previous post about "Cockney Scousers". Must we wish ill on a club just because their success without the help of "plastics" then inevitably attracts some plastics?Lundan Cabbie":31t26io0 said:Cornish Chris":31t26io0 said:Absolutely gutted that Chelsea won today. If they win the double I'm done with football.
I can understand favouring one side over another but do you really care who wins it? To say you will be done with football is dramatically OTT.
And are most of these so-called Cockney Scousers not just neutrals who have dared to say that, given a choice, they'd much rather see Liverpool win the title over Chelsea or Man City, who are genuinely "plastic" (if that's not an oxymoron) in that they've been more or less parachuted onto the top of the pile by virtue of vast cash injections by owners of effectively unlimited wealth?