pilgrim_pete":1g7c42tu said:3 minutes stoppage time was interesting.
Where did it come from?
argyle_ender":1wan2dgc said:pilgrim_pete":1wan2dgc said:3 minutes stoppage time was interesting.
Where did it come from?
The subs? it was fair.
pilgrim_pete":3fyabnl6 said:argyle_ender":3fyabnl6 said:pilgrim_pete":3fyabnl6 said:3 minutes stoppage time was interesting.
Where did it come from?
The subs? it was fair.
There is a common misconception over that rule.
They are not obliged to add on 30 seconds for a substitution, like most people think.
Liffrok":3473e44u said:Injury time is completely arbitrary anyway. If they actually added on the correct amount of time for stoppages there would be about 20 minutes added on to every game.
Maybe they should cut the contreversy, and have 60 minute match on a basketball style stop clock system.ShaunySandello":1h0xmrfj said:Liffrok":1h0xmrfj said:Injury time is completely arbitrary anyway. If they actually added on the correct amount of time for stoppages there would be about 20 minutes added on to every game.
Yep.
I think the ball is only actually "in play" for just over an hour of the game.
And Spurs played their part too :lol:Babararacucudada":102l2dkb said:Andrew Owen":102l2dkb said:A phone call from a Mr R. Mudoch of Sydney Australia to keep the title race going whatever it takes. That's where the 3 minutes came from.
Andrew Owen":3ejltua7 said:A phone call from a Mr R. Mudoch of Sydney Australia to keep the title race going whatever it takes. That's where the 3 minutes came from.