Hmm...
I'm sure that the first thing that always springs to peoples minds when they think of Kevin Heaney, is credibility.
I'm sure that the first thing that always springs to peoples minds when they think of Kevin Heaney, is credibility.
I support them because they are trying to save my football club. What are your motives, you want to see us liquidated?Gareth Nicholson":195ry5i8 said:esmer":195ry5i8 said:I've already done so. You don't think that his anti Heaney rhetoric on here including criticising the lack of transparency of plan A while all the time being in line for a directorship under plan B without declaring it displays a lack of credibility?
But it's all hypothetical because he has confirmed he has no intention of being one of James Brent's directors (if I understand him correctly)
As I suspect you know, you misunderstand him deliberately. Given the reputation of the people you purport to support merely because you think they are worthy of your support (and not because you are connected to them in some way), I think it's rich for you to be touting the word 'credibility'.
Credible is getting a deal in place as quickly as possible so staff can be paid. Credible is not asset-stripping the club. Credible is putting more than a quid into the club.
esmer":1nus9foz said:It's not me, or as far as I know Heaney touting credibility, it is Heaney's detractors, including Peter Jones.Gareth Nicholson":1nus9foz said:esmer":1nus9foz said:I've already done so. You don't think that his anti Heaney rhetoric on here including criticising the lack of transparency of plan A while all the time being in line for a directorship under plan B without declaring it displays a lack of credibility?
But it's all hypothetical because he has confirmed he has no intention of being one of James Brent's directors (if I understand him correctly)
As I suspect you know, you misunderstand him deliberately. Given the reputation of the people you purport to support merely because you think they are worthy of your support (and not because you are connected to them in some way), I think it's rich for you to be touting the word 'credibility'.
Credible is getting a deal in place as quickly as possible so staff can be paid. Credible is not asset-stripping the club. Credible is putting more than a quid into the club.
esmer":1obrktko said:Never sent an e-mail. Agree I could have worded things better The point is that plan B is touted as the moral option, plan A isn't.
esmer":3gym9guw said:greengenes":3gym9guw said:esmer":3gym9guw said:I've sure Peter Jones would make a fine director but feel that the club, at a time of re-birth, could do without the credibility issue that would surround him.
I dare you to put in print why you think Peter Jones lacks credibilty Esmer . Go on do it.
I've already done so. You don't think that his anti Heaney rhetoric on here including criticising the lack of transparency of plan A while all the time being in line for a directorship under plan B without declaring it displays a lack of credibility?
But it's all hypothetical because he has confirmed he has no intention of being one of James Brent's directors (if I understand him correctly)
esmer":2on3iwrz said:Never sent an e-mail. Agree I could have worded things better The point is that plan B is touted as the moral option, plan A isn't.
BALDY-OG":cf679zss said:What are you squabbling children going to do with yourselves in the event that the FL gives the go ahead, Plan A comes to fruition and our club comes out of administration? :lol:
BALDY-OG":1cjzjei0 said:What are you squabbling children going to do with yourselves in the event that the FL gives the go ahead, Plan A comes to fruition and our club comes out of administration? :lol:
BALDY-OG":3lw9vw3r said:Absolutely not but the position will have moved on significantly. Decisions will have been taken and we will have to face up to a reality of ownership; funding sources; landlord status etc etc. We will have to accept that the FL have been satisfied. The landscape will have changed.
BALDY-OG":h4vl9a3n said:LT - If somone could clearly demonstrate to me the genuine facts of the two deals (not the PASOTI type) and show how one is better than the other and satisfies the admin process I will take a position and fight for it. Added to that, if there is a better deal than Plan A it matters not a jot while A is the preferred bid. Everything else is hot air. We the fans are just bystanders and PASOTI is a minority of the fan base to boot. This is a property deal at the end of the day (plan A & B) and the interests of fans are a long way down the pecking order. I hear X Isle shouting 'surrender monkey' already but I prefer realist. I applaud IJN and a few others for actually getting off their bums and doing something; the majority of us aren't even making a noise.