jackell9":22xg2ni1 said:When he was substituted, was he unhappy? Looked like fletcher was very unhappy with him ?
Nobby":3iwv11nk said:This surprised me, considering I thought Young was playing terribly.
Ollieargyle9":2wuy2eot said:Nobby":2wuy2eot said:This surprised me, considering I thought Young was playing terribly.
To be fair, Young was much improved when we brought on Feeney and Chadwick and went 4-4-2. I agree his game was full of mistakes but with two men in front of him and the momentum switching to Argyle he came into his own.
X Isle":1ndf1bnh said:Unlikely, he's his love child.
Centre Circle":3912qkwl said:He did throw a bit of a sulk as he walked off - as did Griffiths, who took forever to depart.
Ollieargyle9":up8fkjdb said:Nobby":up8fkjdb said:This surprised me, considering I thought Young was playing terribly.
To be fair, Young was much improved when we brought on Feeney and Chadwick and went 4-4-2. I agree his game was full of mistakes but with two men in front of him and the momentum switching to Argyle he came into his own.
dani_B":d5ghx8kf said:I get annoyed at being subbed for my Sunday morning pub team, I would fully expect a professional player to feel the same
MAZZA26":1yxk02ro said:X Isle":1yxk02ro said:Unlikely, he's his love child.
There you go. Proof that someone has indeed hacked into your account. Your posts used to be quite meaningful and had substance to them. At least other posters on here who aren't fletch fans are trying to be fair and reasonable.
The guy was subbed so that proves that fletch isn't afraid to make a tough decision or two (if indeed it is his love child it must have been really tough eh?) Plus reading from someone who was at the actual g-a-m-e Hourihane was substituted, got in a slight strop and Fletch had a go at him... Make of it what you will but you can fault him for his starting plan/formation etc... but give him credit with the changes he made... is that too much to ask?