oldage":2uvbinyn said:I think you would find the reason some fans are losing patience is because we have already wasted a season after last year's debacle. People shout "get it forward" because we waste so much time faffing around at the back. If the players aren't up to it why persist in these tactics against teams like Cambridge?Forest of Dean Green":2uvbinyn said:Gary S":2uvbinyn said:Cobi Budge":2uvbinyn said:Plan A works though, the majority of the time, we’re 4th in the league and the form table has shown steady improvement over the course of the season as the players have become more accustomed to the system. Plan A is what we’re about, it’s our philosophy, our style, the way we want to play long term, at all levels of the club. Adaptations and small alterations sure, but a plan B is for when plan A doesn’t work or you don’t have faith in it, which we should.
The point about having a footballing philosophy is continuity, from good results to bad results, from good form patches to poor/average form patches, from sets of players to different sets of players, sometimes if it’s a club philosophy (Swansea for example) even from manager to manager, it’s overarching, it supersedes the short term in the hope of providing long term gain, that’s why we stick to it and don’t move to a plan B willy nilly when things aren’t quite clicking in a particular match, and that’s the right way to go in my view.
Cobi, a well-reasoned post, and I largely agree with what you say. Abandoning a decent philosophy at the first sign of trouble would not be the way to long-term success, and the philosophy, and those behind it, should be given time to improve. Having said that, I feel that what may be bothering many at the moment is not so much the lack of a Plan B, but the narrowness in scope of the Plan A. The current plan A smacks of stubbornness in that there is no apparent change even when the plan is blatantly not working, as was the case against Cambridge. It was obvious to those watching that there was a need for something different to break Cambridge down, but all we got was a change in personnel, not in strategy. The top teams have the kind of "whole club on the same wavelength" philosophy that you advocate, and which I agree with, but they are not afraid to tweak things during a game when needed. To use the wider aspect of their plan A, if you like.
For Cambridge read our performance v Liverpool away in be cup. Sometimes teams set up to draw and even the best in the business can’t play their way through. And you wouldn’t expect a change in philosophy from Liverpool. It was one of those games and in the main, it works. When you are sat in the stands and you hear people shouting to ‘get it forward’ when we have a game based on playing through the thirds, recycling and retaining the ball (being patient) and, mostly, winning, it’s disappointing. This is much better fare but we need to always remember the reason it doesn’t always come off is that we are league 2 and players are inconsistent, sometimes teams set us puzzles we can’t crack, and occasionally we just aren’t on our game. None of those are reasons to lose patience.
Adams wasted a season. Not Lowe. He has us in the hunt.