I agree with that Doc.The season before Rooney took over Birmingham finished 17th on 53 points (so 1.15 points per game with Eustace as manager). The season before that they were 20th with 47 points (1.02 points per game with Lee Bowyer as manager) and the one before that they were 18th with 52 point (1.13 points per game with Karanka and Bowyer as managers). So whilst Rooney didn't do very well at Birmingham he can't really be blamed for Birmingham's woes. They have been pretty rubbish for years and the players that Rooney worked with were all in place before he got there. Birmingham might have been 6th under Eustace when he was sacked but no-one can surely think that they would have finished anywhere near that position at the end of the season. They'd only played a small number of games at the start of the season when a win or two can elevate a team's league position hugely. Okay, Rooney didn't make things better and he probably made things worse (but perhaps only temporarily so - who knows?) but he's just a convenient scapegoat for Birmingham fans on who they could lump all their disappointment and shame about their team's disappointing (or at least below expectations) performances over multiple years.
Wife and in-laws are Bluenoses, so I had a fairly close view of Rooney's tenure at Brum.
He seems to have learned lessons about his approach. He's far more hands on as a head coach than he was as a manager for them.
We have also been a more settled and stable club than them. Like you say, they've been treading water of relegation for the best part of a decade now. A truly destablised season toppled them in the end.
We're bang on 1ppg as things stand. 1.87ppg at home and 0.22ppg away. As a data driven club, the underlying numbers of our home performances should strike serious concern as they ultimately suggest the away form is more representative of how we're playing (bar the 5 games between Sept & Oct international breaks).
I've seen comments that the players are not up to the complexity of how Rooney is trying to play. I'd actually argue the opposite. I think tactically we are approaching the games with a far too basic game plan for the Championship.
Lowe & Schuey had League Two & League One squads playing intricate, well drilled football. Player quality meant that didn't always come off, but we looked competitive in games and it was an exciting watch more often than not (L2 > Championship).
For much of this season we have looked lost in games. Particularly on the ball for me, the stats of our low number of entries and touches in the opposition box and poor chance creation are evidence of a lack of coached patterns of play (at the very least quality ideas).
Following the Sheff Wed debacle we looked more structured and organised off the ball, but since the October international break that appears to have been in decline both home and away. We don't appear to know whether we're coming or going in the press and we are continually drawn into overload situations far too easily (hence the high oppo entries into our box and high xG against).
The performances away are getting the results they deserve. The results at home aren't sustainable if the performances continue in the manner that they are. We have individual quality and a whole heap of character to thank for not being in a significantly worse situation, I believe.