- Sep 30, 2003
I didn’t tell anyone what they think. I asked emu what he thought were the reasons Blair was like the tories. He showed a graph that had Blair to be more of a fascist than Thatcher and on another graph by the same person near to Hitler. If that’s what his opinion is based on , I apologiseHow dare you tell others what they think and what they don’t think! Opinions are based on what people see and hear, be it on the news, internet or elsewhere. You have based plenty or your opinions on opinion polls, which are by definition other peoples opinions.
Blair introduced the privatisation of the NHS and went to war to suck up to the yanks, sounds very Tory to me, but I read that so it’s obviously not my opinion and therefore not valid.
Jeez Green Thing do keep up mate, Emu said he couldn’t be arsed to tell us what he thought, the graph with arbitrary points on it showing Blair was more of a fascist than Thatcher wasn’t what Emu thought it was someone else’s graph .Again you say something then claim you don't.
meltdown none of which is true but I can take it, would rather we stick to the topic than talking about me thoI'm not obsessing, just pointing out your contradictions. I, like others would like to get involved in discussing issues with a few other people on here but then up you pop and turn it into the MKF show, backtacking, likening people to a 5 year old child, telling people to post on-topic when something veers off slightly after 20 odd pages, telling people that their opinions aren't valid because they read it somewhere. You claim you never said any of this when it's there in black and white. You don't appear to want a discussion, you see it as a game where you want to be the winner. I'll put it to the other mods that we re-name this forum 'MKF Forum', enjoy it.
I'll sum it up in one sentence mate, Starmer's speech went down well with the public and some people are seethingCan someone bring me up to speed with this silly spat about polls please? It's just I must have missed something (and I can't be bothered going back too far) I was under the impression mkf said Starmer's speech was well received according to initial polls .... then someone says that's rubbish and polls can't be trusted.....then (this is where I start to get lost) Daz quotes the poll that actually backs up what mkf was saying..... then mkf slightly misquotes a figure in said poll understating how well Starmer did ...... then he's attacked for not being able to read figures and misrepresenting .....Errrr......
Then in parallel (I think) someone arguing Blair was more right wing than the Tories links an opinion piece from NZ with a plot that I see only goes up to 2008 but appears to show Labour during Blair's time to the left of Tories (apart from Ted Heath's time). .... Errrrr.....
Ahhh - Don't bother.
No, Starmer’s speech went down well with those polled. I pointed to the fact that polls are meaningless as they don’t seem to have any bearing on elections. Boris’ results were not as good, yet he still smashed Labour in the election. It’s not that difficult to grasp for you or ‘Ave it.I'll sum it up in one sentence mate, Starmer's speech went down well with the public and some people are seething