As each game passes I'm beginning to see a second and, seemingly, more serious probIem with having so many foreign players in our PL. For many years the majority of places in the top clubs' squads have been filled with foreign players. People suggested that the decreasing numbers of English players we have to choose from as a cause of our failure to win tournaments.
But having watched the first four England games I see another effect this influx of players has caused. The versions of Saka and Foden we have seen are vastly different to the players we see at Arsenal and Man City. The Real Madrid player of the year Bellingham is streets ahead of the man I've watched in these 4 games. Kane, already a goal- scoring legend after a single season in the Bundesliga, has reminded me of that Welsh fireman we had. John Stones has not once carried the ball out of defence and marauded forward. At City, when fit, he is like a reincarnation of the great Beckenbauer. For England he looks more Darren Purse.
Southgate, Holland and co may be part of the problem, but I genuinely think that these players I mention are better players when surrounded by the likes Odegard, Rhodri, De Bruyne and co. The number of times in these 4 games we have seen England players exasperated when in possession, arms out asking for movement. At their clubs Stones and Alexander-Arnold don't just wander into midfield on a whim, their movement is facilitated by the players who create the opportunity.
The lack of movement and the lethargy is hard to miss. The reason for it is more complicated.
I haven't read the whole thread so apologies if this or a similar suggestion may have got a mention.
I would say the real problem stems from football culture at youth levels.
For example, in France, they have scouts seeking talent from the streets where things are very different - the bumps are harder, everything is quicker, close control is honed better in tighter zones of action, exhibitionist skill is crafted, each kid will learn how to attune their core strength and centre of gravity without the input of a coach/trainer applying principles that reflect the average requirement.
These kids will develop levels of agility and stamina that will match the technical dynamism of the very best prospects - athleticism and discipline would come afterwards with professional training.
With the 'Street-Football' talents who arrive at academies come the skillsets that the other kids look at and want to try themselves - thus influencing development in these top academies with techniques and dynamism that your standard coach can only try to establish.
We don't really have the same culture here so we don't have enough technical prospects coming through.
The reason Messrs Bellingham, Foden, Saka and Kane look better at their clubs is because they are training and playing with more players who, from very early ages, have developed skillsets in environments with far greater technical pressure where everything is quicker.
Each of the aforementioned four shows a level and blend of talent that fits well with players who present 'Street-Football' credentials, but we don't produce enough of them because there's not enough influence from the streets.
I'm sure that might sound a bit preachy and, perhaps, defeatist, but the game's changed and we're lagging because our culture of football is limited by it's own arrogance.
In youth football, like with many things in this country, we have a lazy habit of dealing with one problem at a time.
The very best will always, like the very best business people, look at where they are and compare that with where they want to be within a set period of time, they will then identify what needs to change and how that fabric of change can be best laid - that's called a strategy, and it's the one thing our football culture, from the top to the bottom, just doesn't have.
So, I would not be remotely surprised if the men's England team win nothing in my lifetime - it's actually what I expect.
I'd love to be proven wrong, but I'm pretty certain I won't be.