Camara made available for transfer | PASOTI
  • This site is sponsored by Lang & Potter.

Camara made available for transfer

jimsing

jimsing

Feb 8, 2005
4,410
2,554
Interesting policy.

Sell with twelve months on his contract, rather than let his contract run out and go for free.

Definite change in policy.

How does that affect those others in a similar position? eg Houghton, although to be fair, he hasn't been offered a new contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Justin
mutley marvel

mutley marvel

Cream First
✅ Evergreen
Feb 13, 2021
8,758
8,214
No one is bigger than the club- they gave Pan time to make is mind up but if is heart is no longer in it why keep an unhappy player
The writing was on the wall when he did not commit
He has been a good servant - but we are just a stepping stone
We will no doubt take the undisclosed fee (because all our transfer activity is always undisclosed) & invest it in bringing in a suitable replacement
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lancastergreen
Mauge's forehead

Mauge's forehead

Dec 9, 2008
112
50
As Green Day once said 'something unpredictable, but in the end it's right. I hope you have the time of your life'

Love the bloke to bits, but we can't risk losing him for nothing. Hard to even say we could've sold him in January, what message would that have sent out given the position we were in and the ambition we had? Good luck Pan and we've done all we can on it really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David Doidge
Justin

Justin

Mar 16, 2009
1,097
698
London
IJN said:
By God we're going to miss him.

However, correct policy by the club.
Click to expand...

I think the club have this policy wrong.

Arguably our best outfield player, very hard to replace for pocket money. He clearly likes playing for the club so I don't buy the argument that he won't give his all. Do we now accept a lowball bid?

It makes it very difficult to extract good value from a transfer fee now we've made a public statement.

Feels very naive.
 
  • Eye-Roll
  • Like
Reactions: Andy B. and Allanon
IJN

IJN

Site Owner
Nov 29, 2012
9,601
23,731
So if we play him for the season we could lose (say) £400k?

His agent has obviously done his homework and said "I can get you (a guess) £15k a week rather than (another guess) £6k a week at Plymouth".

He's bound to ease up, he's bound to go, at least way we can screw a deal with add ons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Argyle sy, saxman, Argylegames and 2 others
Frank Butcher

Frank Butcher

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
✨Pasoti Donor✨
Oct 9, 2003
5,466
1,752
Gairloch
One would imagine his ‘representatives’ are already aware of a higher wage offer which Argyle couldn't or wouldn’t match. A shame but a well done to the club from me - now let’s see a bidding war.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JannerinCardiff, Argylegames and David Doidge
HC Green

HC Green

May 8, 2011
5,788
794
Justin said:
I think the club have this policy wrong.

Arguably our best outfield player, very hard to replace for pocket money. He clearly likes playing for the club so I don't buy the argument that he won't give his all. Do we now accept a lowball bid?

It makes it very difficult to extract good value from a transfer fee now we've made a public statement.

Feels very naive.
Click to expand...
jimsing said:
Interesting policy.

Sell with twelve months on his contract, rather than let his contract run out and go for free.

Definite change in policy.

How does that affect those others in a similar position? eg Houghton, although to be fair, he hasn't been offered a new contract.
Click to expand...
It is the same policy that Peterborough has, which is why Broom is available for transfer.
I assume therefore that all the other players in the final year of their contract will also be available for transfer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom