Why did you ask the question? It's not a serious or reasonable question is it? How am I supposed to know how many stewards? Just like you absolutely don't know its not economically viable. Are you telling me Premiership clubs can't afford it? So we are going to risk players safety for the sake of economy? You are wrong.
Nope don't get it. You started asking for scientific evidence for something which is obvious. That increased security would improve safety. The costs/viability are absolutely not relevant as I said. You seem to be suggesting we sacrifice players safety to save money. And are you suggesting Premier League clubs, even Championship clubs, can't afford it? You seem to be.
You started the sarcasm with your reply to my original question, which was a sensible one. If you don’t like sarcasm and rudeness, don’t start it in the first place. You seem to assume that every question is a pop at you, which isn’t the case.
No the question was not a sensible one. You knew I would not know the answer so why ask? It was a loaded question. Then you start going on about scientific evidence to continue a disagreement from Brexit threat which you didn't want to pursue when you didn't have a suitable response.
It was a sensible question that you got narky about for no reason whatsoever. If you can’t discuss something properly, pi$$ off. Bye.
Oh the irony! Hilarious.
You know what, it was a serious question without any agenda which you reacted badly to for some reason I really don’t understand. I’ve explained why the question was relevant. I admit that I shouldn’t have reacted to your sarcasm like I did, I shouldn’t have lowered myself to your level. However, you’re making me out to be a pr@@k because you are seeing loaded questions and taking offence when there is none. If you cannot have a discussion like a normal human being without acting like a tw@, then I’m out. Bye.
You are the one making a big deal about it, taking offence and being abusive. Not me. 'Heal thy self'. But I'm the one unable to have a discussion whilst you tell me to p$ss off, grow up and stop acting like a tw%t. You couldn't make it up. As I said hilarious.
Boring
You think my original post was loaded and you started being sarcastic because you wrongly thought I was having a dig. You’re either paranoid or on a wind-up. If your too thick to understand that the original question wasn’t sensible or relevant, then there’s no point is there?
Final post. 2 questions; 1. Did you think I would know how many stewards would be required? Obviously not. But YOU weren't happy with my reply.Boring
so, I’ll let you have your final word, you can have your lap of honour and pat yourself on the back and feel like your intelligent and then everyone els can get on with the discussion in hand. Crack on and go for it.
Apologies. Just find it difficult when somebody is unwilling to accept a perfectly valid point but is unable to respond to reasonable questions and becomes abusive.
1. As your post suggested that the club could stop pitch invasions with increased stewarding, I thought you might have some sort of idea how many would be required to achieve this, it wasn’t obvious that you wouldn’t have an answer, even if it was just an estimate on your part. It wasn’t a loaded question or any attempt to catch you out, I really was asking an honest question. I wasn’t happy with your sarcastic answer because of the sarcasm rather than the content, although I’m sorry for losing my rag over it.
