Its wrong to call anyone greedy, when the facts aren't known, but my gut feel this is exactly the issue here and we are right to move on.
The usual issue of location, one would confidently assume is not an issue here, so next comes the length of contract, considering Adams has declared it goes beyond the end of the season, Argyle were prepared to offer a 12, 18 or 24 month contract to a player who is lacking match fitness and has had injury issues. Even as an outsider looking in, i think you would call the club as being fair.
The one ingredient missing is the salary, we dont know it (we'll no doubt have friend's of friends confirming figures from £250 a week to £2500 a week all of which will be gospel) - but in this instance clearly this appears to be the issue.
Football is a fickle business but anyone offering Joe a long contract for stupid money deserve to get stung.
The usual issue of location, one would confidently assume is not an issue here, so next comes the length of contract, considering Adams has declared it goes beyond the end of the season, Argyle were prepared to offer a 12, 18 or 24 month contract to a player who is lacking match fitness and has had injury issues. Even as an outsider looking in, i think you would call the club as being fair.
The one ingredient missing is the salary, we dont know it (we'll no doubt have friend's of friends confirming figures from £250 a week to £2500 a week all of which will be gospel) - but in this instance clearly this appears to be the issue.
Football is a fickle business but anyone offering Joe a long contract for stupid money deserve to get stung.