Ottawa Green
Site Admin
Staff member
šØš¦šØš¦šØš¦šØš¦šØš¦šØš¦
š Callum Wright 23/24
Cream First
ā
Evergreen
āØPasoti DonorāØ
Electronic":28blwwdb said:Donāt you mean Argyle fans from Plymouth who live in London, Leeds and Southampton?
Most people who object to the plan feel that way simply because they donāt understand why James Brent bolted on the HHP plans unnecessarily and risked the grandstand refurb. The parking/traffic issues are a symptom of that. Letās see what happens. Any delays been mooted yet?
Electronic":1s0frsna said:Donāt you mean Argyle fans from Plymouth who live in London, Leeds and Southampton?
Most people who object to the plan feel that way simply because they donāt understand why James Brent bolted on the HHP plans unnecessarily and risked the grandstand refurb. The parking/traffic issues are a symptom of that. Letās see what happens. Any delays been mooted yet?
HC Green":3o35lqaw said:Electronic":3o35lqaw said:Donāt you mean Argyle fans from Plymouth who live in London, Leeds and Southampton?
Most people who object to the plan feel that way simply because they donāt understand why James Brent bolted on the HHP plans unnecessarily and risked the grandstand refurb. The parking/traffic issues are a symptom of that. Letās see what happens. Any delays been mooted yet?
The motive of the people objecting to the plans is that they are doing so because they would regard any planning refusal or delay as a victory as in their mindset it would harm James Brent regardless of the detrimental impact on Argyle.
You just to read the posts most of the āobjectorsā have put on Facebook and ATD over the years about the Chairman also with their trying to find any reason possible to put forward as an objection and then criticise organisations like FOCP who donāt object to come to that conclusion.
An example of this is the same people criticising Argyle for not increasing the capacity of Home Park as part of the plans and saying it would limit the future expansion of Home Park objecting to the current plans due to lack of parking and increased traffic.
monkeywrench":35fdd71t said:HC Green":35fdd71t said:Electronic":35fdd71t said:Donāt you mean Argyle fans from Plymouth who live in London, Leeds and Southampton?
Most people who object to the plan feel that way simply because they donāt understand why James Brent bolted on the HHP plans unnecessarily and risked the grandstand refurb. The parking/traffic issues are a symptom of that. Letās see what happens. Any delays been mooted yet?
The motive of the people objecting to the plans is that they are doing so because they would regard any planning refusal or delay as a victory as in their mindset it would harm James Brent regardless of the detrimental impact on Argyle.
You just to read the posts most of the āobjectorsā have put on Facebook and ATD over the years about the Chairman also with their trying to find any reason possible to put forward as an objection and then criticise organisations like FOCP who donāt object to come to that conclusion.
An example of this is the same people criticising Argyle for not increasing the capacity of Home Park as part of the plans and saying it would limit the future expansion of Home Park objecting to the current plans due to lack of parking and increased traffic.
Think you've just smashed that one out of the park HC Green.
Ollieargyle9":2qcbqk29 said:Electronic":2qcbqk29 said:Donāt you mean Argyle fans from Plymouth who live in London, Leeds and Southampton?
Most people who object to the plan feel that way simply because they donāt understand why James Brent bolted on the HHP plans unnecessarily and risked the grandstand refurb. The parking/traffic issues are a symptom of that. Letās see what happens. Any delays been mooted yet?
So they were worried the extras would delay the grandstand's planning approval?
Of course the logical response would be to object, that'll speed things up...
It is fair to say that such contradictory positions bear the hallmarks of an "anything but (James) Brent" outlook. Consistency is not a golden thread through these objections.HC Green":3mzaog5h said:Electronic":3mzaog5h said:Donāt you mean Argyle fans from Plymouth who live in London, Leeds and Southampton?
Most people who object to the plan feel that way simply because they donāt understand why James Brent bolted on the HHP plans unnecessarily and risked the grandstand refurb. The parking/traffic issues are a symptom of that. Letās see what happens. Any delays been mooted yet?
The motive of the people objecting to the plans is that they are doing so because they would regard any planning refusal or delay as a victory as in their mindset it would harm James Brent regardless of the detrimental impact on Argyle.
You just to read the posts most of the āobjectorsā have put on Facebook and ATD over the years about the Chairman also with their trying to find any reason possible to put forward as an objection and then criticise organisations like FOCP who donāt object to come to that conclusion.
An example of this is the same people criticising Argyle for not increasing the capacity of Home Park as part of the plans and saying it would limit the future expansion of Home Park objecting to the current plans due to lack of parking and increased traffic.
Electronic":2bb2dwi4 said:Ollieargyle9":2bb2dwi4 said:Electronic":2bb2dwi4 said:Donāt you mean Argyle fans from Plymouth who live in London, Leeds and Southampton?
Most people who object to the plan feel that way simply because they donāt understand why James Brent bolted on the HHP plans unnecessarily and risked the grandstand refurb. The parking/traffic issues are a symptom of that. Letās see what happens. Any delays been mooted yet?
So they were worried the extras would delay the grandstand's planning approval?
Of course the logical response would be to object, that'll speed things up...
I meant objection of the conscientious sort, rather than documented objection. The former is a far broader church.
Electronic":2efrodzo said:Donāt you mean Argyle fans from Plymouth who live in London, Leeds and Southampton?
Most people who object to the plan feel that way simply because they donāt understand why James Brent bolted on the HHP plans unnecessarily and risked the grandstand refurb. The parking/traffic issues are a symptom of that. Letās see what happens. Any delays been mooted yet?
IJN":13drpph7 said:I wonder if weāll get the same people from London, Leeds and Southampton complaining about this one?