I think that’s a well calibrated statement. Anything short of stating it has been a disappointing season would have led to ridicule for a new owner that has to establish himself. So that’s sensible. Anything that publically endorsed Adams long term, the same. So omitting that was sensible and saying nothing about it was right. What good would it do with 2 games to go?
And he also restates what we already know. New money for the team will come from revenue generated, not financing of debt by directors. And the grandstand is key to that. Nothing new there, and in those terms the grandstand is absolutely the right thing to do, so long as the profit does come back to the team (and we will need the transparency on finances to see that this is the case, as far as they can given commercial sensitivities)
The only thing that this statement clarifies is that the owner is not happy with the performance of the team. He’d be barmy and deluded if he wasn’t. So that’s a good thing.