The Vibe at Stoke (a) | Page 8 | PASOTI
  • This site is sponsored by Lang & Potter.

The Vibe at Stoke (a)

Will you boo or cheer Schuey on Saturday?

  • Boo

    Votes: 107 34.0%
  • Cheer/applaud

    Votes: 26 8.3%
  • I don't care

    Votes: 182 57.8%

  • Total voters
    315
Dec 9, 2012
555
587
Questions to which we will never know the answer.

If Schumacher had stayed, would Azaz and Cundle have stayed, and would we have won three away games by now?

Might have won a few more sat home, of course!

Anyway, cant go on Saturday, but wouldn't boo if I did. Would go nuts if we won though!
 
Oct 10, 2018
1,223
1,089
Wishful thinking or rumour? Could he genuinely be a candidate for us, if Stoke decided to sack him at the end of the season?
Neither, from the comments SH made onmpod cast, he felt very and genuinely let down as SS had come to him and discussed his aspirations to move on, it's why the club wouldn't let Sheuy go into dressing room to say good bye to the players. That sounds like he burnt his brodges.
 
Jan 4, 2005
8,877
1,086
NEWQUAY
Questions to which we will never know the answer.

If Schumacher had stayed, would Azaz and Cundle have stayed, and would we have won three away games by now?

Might have won a few more sat home, of course!

Anyway, cant go on Saturday, but wouldn't boo if I did. Would go nuts if we won though!
I think it has already been recorded on here that the salary offered to Azaz in order to move by 'Boro would have been enough to make SH's eyes water, even if Villa shaded the transfer fee in favour of Argyle. I admit it would have been great if he had stayed, but it was what it was,and we were forced to move into the post Jan season with lesser replacements.
 
Sep 7, 2006
485
763
London
Questions to which we will never know the answer.

If Schumacher had stayed, would Azaz and Cundle have stayed, and would we have won three away games by now?

Might have won a few more sat home, of course!

Anyway, cant go on Saturday, but wouldn't boo if I did. Would go nuts if we won though!
I reckon Azaz would've gone. Form was so stunningly good that clubs would've wanted to sign him, and Argyle would've been priced out. Basically the same chain of events as what happened.

Cundle...probably stayed on loan? Much harder to be sure.
 
Feb 8, 2005
4,554
2,709
Questions to which we will never know the answer.

If Schumacher had stayed, would Azaz and Cundle have stayed, and would we have won three away games by now?

Might have won a few more sat home, of course!

Anyway, cant go on Saturday, but wouldn't boo if I did. Would go nuts if we won though!
I have, in the back of my mind, that once Shuey knew he was going to Stoke, he was into prising Azaz and Cundle to Stoke because he knew how much we were paying their wages and he also knew that he could outpay us. As a result of Shuey contacting Villa, they were then aware of interest in Azaz, not only from Stoke but also from Middlesbrough, who had been tracking him, and so Middlesbrough gazumped us both by offering to buy him, which Villa accepted, and Shuey could not afford to outbid.

I'm probably wrong, and someone is going to tell me that Middlesbrough were going to make an offer to Villa for Azaz in the January window anyway, but I suspect that was brought forward from next summer because of Stoke's interest in him as well.

Had Shuey not gone to Stoke would Azaz have still been here, and would we have been able to outbid Middlesbrough in the summer for his services? We will never know!
 
  • Like
Reactions: StrictlyGreen
May 4, 2012
5,838
1,280
Sunderland
I'm probably wrong, and someone is going to tell me that Middlesbrough were going to make an offer to Villa for Azaz in the January window anyway, but I suspect that was brought forward from next summer because of Stoke's interest in him as well.
Stoke were never linked that heavily to Azaz because the move to Boro was basically done already. They first contacted Villa just after we played Boro at Home Park.
 
Dec 3, 2005
7,265
1,755
Why oh why would we want him back - he left for the better life at Stoke lol - he couldn't care less about us - the money and so-called better chance of success, he ran to it - no one dragged him up the M5.
As far as I am concerned he has burnt his bridges with this Club.
 

The Pasty Kid

āœ… Evergreen
āœØPasoti DonorāœØ
šŸŒŸSparksy MuralšŸŒŸ
Aug 16, 2006
833
749
Liskeard
I'd take him back, any manager who is successful with us will get poached. It's a job to them, nothing more, but then I don't romanticise players or managers. As long as they give their best while they're here, that's all I ask. There would be a PR job to do, but that's not insurmountable, and at least we'd know what we were getting.
 
Sep 7, 2006
485
763
London
I have, in the back of my mind, that once Shuey knew he was going to Stoke, he was into prising Azaz and Cundle to Stoke because he knew how much we were paying their wages and he also knew that he could outpay us. As a result of Shuey contacting Villa, they were then aware of interest in Azaz, not only from Stoke but also from Middlesbrough, who had been tracking him, and so Middlesbrough gazumped us both by offering to buy him, which Villa accepted, and Shuey could not afford to outbid.

I'm probably wrong, and someone is going to tell me that Middlesbrough were going to make an offer to Villa for Azaz in the January window anyway, but I suspect that was brought forward from next summer because of Stoke's interest in him as well.

Had Shuey not gone to Stoke would Azaz have still been here, and would we have been able to outbid Middlesbrough in the summer for his services? We will never know!
My problem with this type of theory is it ignores the fact that Azaz, and Cundle, were performing well for goals and assists compared to other MFs in the league.

So it's quite conceivable Stoke - an underachieving team with money - would've had their eye on them. Many teams might've shortlisted them based on their goals/assists, plus the fact Argyle didn't own them we could hardly complain about approaches to Villa.

I could buy into a narrative that John Coates, in his chopper, sipping champagne, said "look Steven, at clubs like Stoke you can own these mere loanees like Azaz and Cundle, in fact we're in for both in Jan" :ROFLMAO:

But all hypothetical, and other facts at play too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trelawny
Jun 17, 2006
307
677
Reading
Hopefully we beat them, he gets sacked and then we employ him. Thatā€™s what I would like.
Nope, weā€™ve got enough ball-boys. Joking aside, if Schuey had simply jumped ship to another club like Ryan Lowe did, then no problemā€¦..more money, closer to home, the individual believes it is career progression (although the average Stoke fan would today disagree šŸ« )ā€¦.so far so football. However, when you also lift the background team, at that time of the year, knowing the devastation it would cause to the club that you were pounding your chest against the club badge a few days earlierā€¦..never again. A key principle of every employment contract is trust and confidence.ā€¦..sorry Schuey, you make your bed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StrictlyGreen