September 11th Tomorrow

GreenKnowledge · **Joined:** Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:03 pm **Location:** PLYMOUTH

Just noticed another year goes buy since that shocking morning.

After studying quite a bit on the attacks i for one am still not sure the Pentagon was hit by a plane.

RIP for the people killed though

Andy_Lannie · **Joined:** Mon Sep 15, 2003 11:45 am **Location:** Denmark

Try telling that to the families of the passengers killed on the plane, I'm sure they'd like to know where they are.

Ghost · **Joined:** Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:45 pm

Can't get my head around that it's been 11 years. Many Brits murdered on that day too.
Never forgotten.

with-menace · **Joined:** Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:46 pm

9-11 was an inside job. the evidence supports that fact.

with-menace · **Joined:** Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:46 pm

Andy_Lannie wrote:

Try telling that to the families of the passengers killed on the plane, I'm sure they'd like to know where they are.

funny how every piece of video evidence of the pentagon 'strike' was confiscated by the CIA :roll:

there are so many anomalies with any history of planes striking buildings you'd have to be a bit foolish to believe the official story which is itself the whackiest 'conspiracy theory' I've ever heard..... apart from building 7 collapsing just to prove every law of physics incorrect.

Quinny · **Posted:** Wed Sep 12, 2012 12:15 am

Where's the last thread on this? I think I answered all the moronic conspiracy theories last-time round.

Anybody who thinks that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane is a f*cking idiot. The testimonies of all of drivers who were on the freeway by the Pentagon, plus the pictures of the remains of the wreckage which is freely available on the internet (unless people are a double-time f*cking idiot and will claim wreckage was planted there by the CIA) is more than sufficient proof that Flight 77 did crash into the building, and to claim otherwise is an insult to the memory of the victims, and an insult to their families, who were on the fated flight.

And I'd love to hear how the collapse of building 7 was against "every law of physics" (gravity excluded, I assume). Please explain in your own words without resorting to cutting and pasting from some crack-pot website.

GreenSam · **Posted:** Wed Sep 12, 2012 12:54 am

Aside from anything else, if this was an inside job, too many people would have to be in on it for it to leak out.

The Julian Assange saga shows there are enough loose lips in the world to sink plenty of ships and I'm sure this is one ship that would have been sunk.

with-menace · **Joined:** Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:46 pm

Quinny wrote:

Where's the last thread on this? I think I answered all the moronic conspiracy theories last-time round.

Anybody who thinks that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane is a f*cking idiot. The testimonies of all of drivers who were on the freeway by the Pentagon, plus the pictures of the remains of the wreckage which is freely available on the internet (unless people are a double-time f*cking idiot and will claim wreckage was planted there by the CIA) is more than sufficient proof that Flight 77 did crash into the building, and to claim otherwise is an insult to the memory of the victims, and an insult to their families, who were on the fated flight.

And I'd love to hear how the collapse of building 7 was against "every law of physics" (gravity excluded, I assume). Please explain in your own words without resorting to cutting and pasting from some crack-pot website.

Nail on head,
I'm not the the one who needs to do explaining here and its you who are the moron I'm not afraid to add.
If after 11 years you're still so utterly brainwashed that you believe the hollywood B movie official version of events I have no intention of trying to convince you of anything, I couldnt care less what you think. You're a lost cause.
So please save me the vastly flawed explaination of why building 7 collapsed,oh and dont go copy and pasting from popular mechanics. Anyone else want to chip in?Go on lets hear it :funny:

.
PS here are some 'moron' expert architects and engineers who know what bullshit looks and smells like but I guess you're way smarter than all of these top in their field experts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8wSquKIBog

Womble · **Joined:** Thu Jun 23, 2011 1:21 pm **Location:** Plymouth

Quinny wrote:

Where's the last thread on this? I think I answered all the moronic conspiracy theories last-time round.

Anybody who thinks that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane is a f*cking idiot. The testimonies of all of drivers who were on the freeway by the Pentagon, plus the pictures of the remains of the wreckage which is freely available on the internet (unless people are a double-time f*cking idiot and will claim wreckage was planted there by the CIA) is more than sufficient proof that Flight 77 did crash into the building, and to claim otherwise is an insult to the memory of the victims, and an insult to their families, who were on the fated flight.

And I'd love to hear how the collapse of building 7 was against "every law of physics" (gravity excluded, I assume). Please explain in your own words without resorting to cutting and pasting from some crack-pot website.

A quite superb post. I am sick of conspiracy thoerists who offer no facts whatsoever to support thier arguement. The type of morons who are preconditioned to be brainwashed are exactly the type who run around with tinfoil hats in case aliens steal their brains.

It was NEVER an inside job. The US security services are not capable of covering something like that up.

with-menace · **Joined:** Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:46 pm

Womble wrote:

Quinny wrote:

Where's the last thread on this? I think I answered all the moronic conspiracy theories last-time round.

Anybody who thinks that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a plane is a f*cking idiot. The testimonies of all of drivers who were on the freeway by the Pentagon, plus the pictures of the remains of the wreckage which is freely available on the internet (unless people are a double-time f*cking idiot and will claim wreckage was planted there by the CIA) is more than sufficient proof that Flight 77 did crash into the building, and to claim otherwise is an insult to the memory of the victims, and an insult to their families, who were on the fated flight.

And I'd love to hear how the collapse of building 7 was against "every law of physics" (gravity excluded, I assume). Please explain in your own words without resorting to cutting and pasting from some crack-pot website.

A quite superb post. I am sick of conspiracy thoerists who offer no facts whatsoever to support thier arguement. The type of morons who are preconditioned to be brainwashed are exactly the type who run around with tinfoil hats in case aliens steal their brains.

It was NEVER an inside job. The US security services are not capable of covering something like that up.

Oh dear someones cacking themselves that their whole belief system is based on a pack of lies, I suggest you look up what ' conspiracy theory' even means before you go spouting it like so many sun reading twerps. Here you go, I don't expect for one second that the sort of ignorant goon such as yourself who runs his gob would actually have ever taken ten seconds of his time to look past the Murdoch headlines but please read all of this link, you might learn something,but 'sigh' people like you aren't interested in finding out the facts are you?
Here are some more 'morons' who just incidentally have more qualification that the entire us military-government
http://911scholars.org/
Don't expect you'll bother tho, there ain't many pictures

with-menace · **Joined:** Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:46 pm

http://911scholars.org/
9-11 was an inside job
The evidence supports it

Cornish Chris · **Posted:** Wed Sep 12, 2012 12:12 pm

with-menace wrote:

9-11 was an inside job. the evidence supports that fact.

Oh for Christ's sakes, not this rubbish again. Turn your computer off. Go outside. Meet some girls.

with-menace · **Joined:** Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:46 pm

Cornish Chris wrote:

with-menace wrote:

9-11 was an inside job. the evidence supports that fact.

Oh for Christ's sakes, not this rubbish again. Turn your computer off. Go outside. Meet some girls.

Er... And you're doing what exactly ?
Make sure you get all them crayons out your nose this time dear. :sigh:

Chill-Pil-Grim · **Posted:** Wed Sep 12, 2012 12:36 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

What really gets me is the assumption that those who don't believe in the conspiracy, whichever one it is, (although the "attack didn't happen at all" one is particularly loathsome) are somehow less informed than they are.

When you talk to a conspiracist, (and i'm not wanting to get personal, this is just what ive observed), they don't usually believe in just ONE conspiracy. They are far more likely to also believe in say, Princess Di having been assassinated, or Atlantis, or fake moon landings, Gnomes of Zurich, Lizard people. The list goes on. It's almost a condition.

I must be a closed mind sheep. Even though i've marched to a different drum my entire life, was an avid reader of Fortean Times in my stoner days, and a wannabee anarchist before i started actually developing my real passion in life.

I've heard allllll about scholars for 911, and pilots for 911, the "evidence" they present, the methodology they used to glean it, thermite, second planes, missing flights, wtc7 structural integrity, etc ad infinitum....and i've also read allllll about the debunking of the scholars and pilots for 911. Piece by piece. One by one.

Thankfully we have science; REAL science, science that doesn't have to spend valuable time debunking every conspiracy theory thrown at them because they have better things to do, like save lives and explore space, discover particles.... That...stuff..Empirical. Stuff that i've seen work, that means we can have this discussion over a communications medium spanning the globe.

So If i have to take sides, i think ill pitch in with those. Scientific theory and discovery based on testing and observation.

Was there a massive breakdown in security and/or intended/unintended knowledge of a possible attack? Possibly.

Did the attacks happen? yeeeeeep. Sadly.

I realise how utterly fruitless this post is. It's a religiously observed belief system, almost a faith, not based on real scientific concensus.

Back to mundane for me.

Now THAT'S some scary shi*t..

with-menace · **Joined:** Mon Jul 25, 2011 5:46 pm

That's right, let's just forget why millions of people are still being murdered around the world because of this lie. You've convinced me, there's no point trying to hold any sort of debate. Why don't we all bend over and thank them for reaming us every day.

September 11th Tomorrow

Who is online