Messageboard Home  | Fantasy Football  | Predictions  | Club Info  | About P@SOTI   Auction Payments
New Season kicks off in: Support P@SOTI

It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 1:34 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
Online
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 1:38 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:47 pm
Adkins has 2 more games to change things round. I'm sure Redknapp will be watching closely.

_________________
Everyday above ground is a good day


Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:18 pm 

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:09 pm
Bournemouth i reckon he is already doing an advisory role at the moment so may be he will just take over haha...wouldnt want him at argyle he is useless and ruins every club he goes to (bar spurs)


Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:19 pm 

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 1:24 am
Tugboat wrote:
Adkins has 2 more games to change things round. I'm sure Redknapp will be watching closely.


If that is true it is a ridiculous state of affairs.
He is paying the price for getting them promoted twice, too quickly!


Last edited by Plympton Pong on Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:20 pm 

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 1:24 am
janner_Buhy wrote:
Bournemouth i reckon he is already doing an advisory role at the moment so may be he will just take over haha...wouldnt want him at argyle he is useless and ruins every club he goes to (bar spurs)


I'd go for Bournemouth too.
They have a shady Russian businessman bankrolling them with cash, so Harry will be interested.


Top
 Profile  
 
Online
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:55 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:47 pm
Plympton Pong wrote:
Tugboat wrote:
Adkins has 2 more games to change things round. I'm sure Redknapp will be watching closely.


If that is true it is a ridiculous state of affairs.
He is paying the price for getting them promoted twice, too quickly!

We've seen it all before PP. Very few clubs put loyalty before success.

_________________
Everyday above ground is a good day


Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:45 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: Swansea, Welsh Wales
Talk Sport were strongly suggesting it was West Ham a few weeks ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:12 pm 
Member

Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 pm
Location: Plymouth/Southampton
Tugboat wrote:
Plympton Pong wrote:
Tugboat wrote:
Adkins has 2 more games to change things round. I'm sure Redknapp will be watching closely.


If that is true it is a ridiculous state of affairs.
He is paying the price for getting them promoted twice, too quickly!

We've seen it all before PP. Very few clubs put loyalty before success.

Why should any club put loyalty before success? The success of the club is more important than any one man surely? If we needed to sack Fletcher, no-one would blame us for putting success above loyalty.

That said, I'm sceptical that replacing Adkins with Redknapp would be much good. He should at least get given a few more games against some easier teams.


Top
 Profile  
 
Online
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:16 pm 
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:47 pm
GreenSam wrote:
Tugboat wrote:
Plympton Pong wrote:
Tugboat wrote:
Adkins has 2 more games to change things round. I'm sure Redknapp will be watching closely.


If that is true it is a ridiculous state of affairs.
He is paying the price for getting them promoted twice, too quickly!

We've seen it all before PP. Very few clubs put loyalty before success.

Why should any club put loyalty before success? The success of the club is more important than any one man surely? If we needed to sack Fletcher, no-one would blame us for putting success above loyalty.

That said, I'm sceptical that replacing Adkins with Redknapp would be much good. He should at least get given a few more games against some easier teams.


The loyalty would be the fact that he got them there in the first place so should he be sacked after 6 games?

Argument for and against as with everything in life but its not as if they've played bad. Some football has been very good but again, pros and cons.. It's a results buisness.

_________________
Everyday above ground is a good day


Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:27 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:08 am
Location: Plymouth
Wherever he goes, and yes Sarf of Watford is my guess, it will cost them money. Old Wobbly is a media hore like Ollie in many respects.
How the hell does he articulate with the young continental multi lingual players? He struggles to get a choherent sentence together without filling it with Ronglish and football cliche's!

Yeah he's a proper player, on his toes, you cant teach that, over the moon with him, unplayable the lad..................Peter Crouch, then sold!


Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:08 pm 

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 4:09 pm
Baby Hair Johnson wrote:
Talk Sport were strongly suggesting it was West Ham a few weeks ago.

Never in a millions years would they taking hik back!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:14 pm 

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 4:03 pm
Location: PLYMOUTH
Stupid state of affairs if the sack Adkins. All saints fans should expect to be flirting with relegation as all promoted clubs are.

Ideas above their stations again

_________________
IF YOU DONT ENJOY THE STRESS THAT IS BROUGHT UPON US SUPPORTING ARGYLE FIND ANOTHER CLUB. UP OR DOWN STILL CHANTING


Top
 Profile  
 
Online
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:39 pm 
Friend Sponsor
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 3:00 pm
Location: the wild lands west of Penzance
Apparently they're the 7th-highest net spenders in Europe this season.

They were in administration four years ago. Some clubs never learn.

_________________
LGBT football fans - let's kick homophobia out of football

RESURGAM


Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:31 am 

Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 2:49 pm
Cornish Chris wrote:
Apparently they're the 7th-highest net spenders in Europe this season.

They were in administration four years ago. Some clubs never learn.


In League 1. Bit of a difference in income between the Premier League and League 1 and having entirely different owners.


Top
 Profile  
 
Online
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:14 am 

Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:59 pm
Location: Canterbury
Adkins deserves more time, after what he's done for Southampton.

If he goes, I'm sure he will get a job at a top Championship club.


Top
 Profile  
 
Offline
 Post subject: Re: Harry Redknapp
PostPosted: Sat Sep 29, 2012 4:53 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 12:54 pm
Location: Winchester
It is Ipswich.

_________________
Trust member number 640


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: JMS, run_PAFC, tom16pafc and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.