Plympton Pong wrote:
Adkins has 2 more games to change things round. I'm sure Redknapp will be watching closely.
If that is true it is a ridiculous state of affairs.
He is paying the price for getting them promoted twice, too quickly!
We've seen it all before PP. Very few clubs put loyalty before success.
Why should any club put loyalty before success? The success of the club is more important than any one man surely? If we needed to sack Fletcher, no-one would blame us for putting success above loyalty.
That said, I'm sceptical that replacing Adkins with Redknapp would be much good. He should at least get given a few more games against some easier teams.
The loyalty would be the fact that he got them there in the first place so should he be sacked after 6 games?
Argument for and against as with everything in life but its not as if they've played bad. Some football has been very good but again, pros and cons.. It's a results buisness.